On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 12:48:21PM -0500, Byung Yang wrote:
> I lowered the optimization level from -O6 to -O and now it shows the cpu
Offical GCC Project stance is that levels above -O3 are not offically
supported. Above -O3 are experimental (if they are even paid attention
to). Levels above -
-On [19991120 04:01], Byung Yang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>as I see the source code, it is not doing what it is supposed to do.. any
>suggestions? (it's not a big deal but still it's a bug)
>I did not modify any of the source codes.
I think someone else suggested lowering the optimisation level
the feature. Or the processor is broken.
I never reported it because I usually use -O2 , but I have a box that ran
-current up until very recently that was updated fairly often, and it showed
the CPU name as that \^E alot. I checked for sure and it did get the right
id, 0x580 , but still showed \^E
I lowered the optimization level from -O6 to -O and now it shows the cpu
name properly. I was using "-O6 -march=pentium" for the optimization flag
before, but would it affect the performance of the kernela lot if I lower
the optimization flag to -O?
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Jeroen Ruigr
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Byung Yang wrote:
> I lowered the optimization level from -O6 to -O and now it shows the cpu
> name properly. I was using "-O6 -march=pentium" for the optimization flag
> before, but would it affect the performance of the kernela lot if I lower
> the o
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Byung Yang wrote:
> I lowered the optimization level from -O6 to -O and now it shows the cpu
> name properly. I was using "-O6 -march=pentium" for the optimization flag
> before, but would it affect the performance of the kernela lot if I lower
> the o
--
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1999 09:35:18 +0300
From: Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Brian F. Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Strange CPU name reported on my k6-II system
You are probably forget to send this reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Maxim
"Brian F. Feldman" wrote:
On Monday, 5 July 1999 at 20:13:57 +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> When I take a closer look at dmesg output I discovered that my k6-II
> reported as "\^M". Maybe it is because I have an very first stepping (I
> bought my CPU shortly after k6-II appeared on market). Maserboard used -
> Tyan Trinity
"Mark J. Taylor" wrote:
> You didn't include the FreeBSD version in your email. I'd bet that
> it is earlier than 3.2. Get the 3.2 boot floppy and see what it
> indicates (ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/3.2-RELEASE/floppies/kern.flp).
>
> This buglet was supposedly corrected in January.
Unf
When I take a closer look at dmesg output I discovered that my k6-II
reported as "\^M". Maybe it is because I have an very first stepping (I
bought my CPU shortly after k6-II appeared on market). Maserboard used -
Tyan Trinity 100AT (VIA MP3 chipset).
Any ideas?
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 11
ECTED]) wrote:
> >supped && made world a min ago:
> >check out the CPU: name
> >I am using AMD K6-2 333Mhz
>
> >---
> >CPU: \^E (334.40-MHz 586-class CPU)
> > Origin = "AuthenticAMD&qu
Byung Yang wrote:
> supped && made world a min ago:
> check out the CPU: name
> I am using AMD K6-2 333Mhz
>
> CPU: \^E (334.40-MHz 586-class CPU)
Hmm, let me guess... probably you are compiling your kernel with -O3 (or
higher)? If so, try to remove /sys/compile/MYKERNEL
Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looking at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/identcpu.c I see that the 0x580 is:
>
> case 0x580:
> strcat(cpu_model, "K6-2");
> break;
>
> Which gets copied into:
>
> printf("CPU: ");
> strncpy(cpu_model, i386_cpus[cpu].cpu_name, sizeof cp
-On [19991119 04:02], Byung Yang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>supped && made world a min ago:
>check out the CPU: name
>I am using AMD K6-2 333Mhz
>---
>CPU: \^E (334.40-MHz 586-class CPU)
> Origin = "Authenti
supped && made world a min ago:
check out the CPU: name
I am using AMD K6-2 333Mhz
Byung
---
Copyright (c) 1992-1999 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
The Regents of the University of Califor
15 matches
Mail list logo
