On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
> And my mine... I get zero COW optimized faults.
THE E-MAIL EXPLICITLY SAID ONLY TO POST IF YOU HAVE MORE THEN 0 FAULTS
I hope one day the people who don't read this list carefully miss something
really important and it eats your system as a result.
-write faults
0 copy-on-write optimized faults
7306697 zero fill pages zeroed
4185272 zero fill pages prezeroed
1801 intransit blocking page faults
8604076 total VM faults taken
8804200 pages freed
20 pages freed by daemon
2300440 pages freed by exiting processes
16937
ed by the page daemon
7730 pages reactivated
867915 copy-on-write faults
0 copy-on-write optimized faults
1295449 zero fill pages zeroed
1106142 zero fill pages prezeroed
56 intransit blocking page faults
2560858 total VM faults taken
2706144 pages freed
2 pages f
> I get high numbers too:
>
> FreeBSD mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch 3.2-STABLE FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE #3: Sun
> Jun 13 20:31:43 CEST 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys
> /compile/mailtoaster1 i386
Read the original message. It says:
> > I would appreciate it if people running -current would run a
Leif Neland wrote:
>
> > I would appreciate it if people running -current would run a "vmstat -s"
> > and tell me if they see a NON-ZERO value for copy-on-write optimized
> > faults. About six months ago, I implemented a simpler and more general
> > optimiz
sr/src/sys/compile/ASPEN
> i386
> Aspen:[210] vmstat -s
[snip]
>111374 cpu context switches
>22 pages reactivated
> 8410 copy-on-write faults
> 1264 copy-on-write optimized faults
please ignoire this erro...i got to get away from the keyboard
toni
i gets lots of "copy-on-write optimized faults". bu tthis may be a
corner case.
just rebooted my box. its used for ppp with nat aliasing and is in the
middle of a cvsup follwed by 'cvs update -PAd'. the box is fairly
weak40MB in a AMD 5x86-133MHz.
Aspen:[208] uptime
> > 2062637 copy-on-write optimized faults <
> [cut]
>
> > I must have something configured wrong, or???
>
> No, but you didn't read Allan's original posting, the change only applied to
> -CURRENT, your box is running -STABLE ...
>
OKOKOKOK! Don
On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 06:54:07PM +0200, Leif Neland wrote:
>
>
> > I would appreciate it if people running -current would run a "vmstat -s"
> > and tell me if they see a NON-ZERO value for copy-on-write optimized
> > faults. About six months ago, I impl
> I would appreciate it if people running -current would run a "vmstat -s"
> and tell me if they see a NON-ZERO value for copy-on-write optimized
> faults. About six months ago, I implemented a simpler and more general
> optimization at an earlier "fork in the road&q
ew days. At this frequency, the cost of deciding
> whether or not to apply the optimization on every copy-on-write fault
> is greater than what is saved those 26 times it is applied.
I get about 1.5PPM optimized COW faults:
7734278 copy-on-write faults
12 copy-on-write optimized fault
On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 12:47:40AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
>
> 307625181 copy-on-write faults
> 26 copy-on-write optimized faults
Thanks to Bernd and everyone else who has responded. Unless someone
reports a case where the old "optimization" gets applied more
vmstat -s reports these numbers on my computer:
3649151 copy-on-write faults
1 copy-on-write optimized faults
On 29-Oct-99 Alan Cox wrote:
> I would appreciate it if people running -current would run a "vmstat -s"
> and tell me if they see a NON-ZERO value for copy-on
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 02:47:43PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> I would appreciate it if people running -current would run a "vmstat -s"
> and tell me if they see a NON-ZERO value for copy-on-write optimized
> faults. About six months ago, I implemented a simpler and more genera
81472 pages reactivated
9492270 copy-on-write faults
29 copy-on-write optimized faults <<<<<<<<<
18936477 zero fill pages zeroed
10633059 zero fill pages prezeroed
17337 intransit blocking page faults
51673604 total VM faults taken
643
9 pages examined by the page daemon
> 404278 pages reactivated
> 3711393 copy-on-write faults
>199653 copy-on-write optimized faults
> 69735710 zero fill pages zeroed
> 11909269 zero fill pages prezeroed
>253956 intransit blocking page faults
> 198695719 tot
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 02:47:43PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> I would appreciate it if people running -current would run a "vmstat -s"
> and tell me if they see a NON-ZERO value for copy-on-write optimized
> faults. About six months ago, I implemented a simpler and more genera
I would appreciate it if people running -current would run a "vmstat -s"
and tell me if they see a NON-ZERO value for copy-on-write optimized
faults. About six months ago, I implemented a simpler and more general
optimization at an earlier "fork in the road". (In effect, I a
18 matches
Mail list logo