> I'm sure this is a silly question, but then why does usw3 appear to _be_ a
> mirror? Why have usw3 at all?
It's NOT a mirror and I really wish people would stop jumping to
conclusions with tenuous data because it's really very simple and not
like anyone is currently speculating:
1. There is
Bill Swingle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-current:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 11:43:59PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> By chance, playing around with the fact that current.freebsd.org is an
>> alias for usw2.freebsd.org, I found that usw3.freebsd.org (209.180.6.227)
>> mirro
At 01:03 AM 1/25/00 -0800, Bill Swingle wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 11:43:59PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > By chance, playing around with the fact that current.freebsd.org is an
> > alias for usw2.freebsd.org, I found that usw3.freebsd.org (209.180.6.227)
> > mirrors snapshots as well.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 11:43:59PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> By chance, playing around with the fact that current.freebsd.org is an
> alias for usw2.freebsd.org, I found that usw3.freebsd.org (209.180.6.227)
> mirrors snapshots as well. Perhaps something should be added to the
> /snaps
[I know this perhaps isn't the proper list, but -questions and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] haven't replied this post, and the -current list
tends to be a bit more on the ball. Anyway, the problem is about getting a
-CURRENT snapshot :) ]
For the past several days (at least since 2118), I've been t
