>> (shouldn't auth.info be sent somewhere? Currently successful connections
>> don't seem to be logged at all.)
> You didn't include the patch for this :-)
--- /usr/src/etc/syslog.confWed Oct 14 23:59:55 1998
+++ /etc/syslog.confThu Feb 4 02:23:07 1999
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
*.notice;news.
N wrote:
> >> What is the reason behind not installing /usr/libexec/tcpd? I can see not
> >> mucking with /etc/inetd.conf by default, but having the binary around
> >> would definitely save a lot of people some work.
> > RTFCM.
>
> Cool. Excellent. Thanks for the pointer. [sounds of foot in mou
>> What is the reason behind not installing /usr/libexec/tcpd? I can see not
>> mucking with /etc/inetd.conf by default, but having the binary around
>> would definitely save a lot of people some work.
> RTFCM.
Cool. Excellent. Thanks for the pointer. [sounds of foot in mouth insertion]
(shoul
N wrote:
> What is the reason behind not installing /usr/libexec/tcpd? I can see not
> mucking with /etc/inetd.conf by default, but having the binary around
> would definitely save a lot of people some work.
RTFM inetd(8).
RTFCM.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.or
[replies redirected to hopefullly the right place]
> Please check these before potentially starting rumours.
> TCP_WRAPPERS is NOT in STABLE.
I can't really say it's in -CURRENT, either; it installs
/usr/lib/libwrap.so.3 and /usr/include/tcpd.h, but no /usr/libexec/tcpd as
far as I can see. The
