On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, attila! wrote:
> Yes, you are correct: the use of '.' rather than '*'
> stops the recursion into separately mounted files
> systems; thanx for the clarification!
>
> However, the manual syntax for tar is anything but clear
> --typical of the last 25+ ye
The "one filesystem" option means "do not traverse a mount point when
enumerating the tree given by an argument."
You specified .??* *
which includes source dev proc and drv as well as user and usr
once it started enumeraing the subdirs from source
it did not trwverse any mountpoints... just
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 12:46:11PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> I'll look into this later. Thanks for reporting!
I can't reproduce it locally. Could you please provide
more details about your setup?
-Maxim
>
> -Maxim
>
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 02:07:57AM +, attila! wrote:
> > 5.0-CU
I'll look into this later. Thanks for reporting!
-Maxim
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 02:07:57AM +, attila! wrote:
> 5.0-CURRENT as of 1200 28 Sep 2002
>
> tar flag
>
> -l (--one-file-system)
>
> is broken. tar crosses the mount boundary.
>
> NUTS --means I must go to sin
