> >> Background:
>
> >> Ideally struct buf should have had a real OO like operations vector
> >> like vnodes have it, and struct bioops is the first step towards that.
> >>
> >struct buf will eventually become merely an iocmd structure, so why do
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Nick Hibma wrote:
> What about using uppercase names for
>
> buf_complete -> BUF_COMPLETE
>
> and friends to make it apparent that an indirect call is being made and
Ugh. Upper case names for function-like interfaces are for ones that
might be implemented as unsafe
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HEADSUP: bioops patch.
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 22:29:32 +0200
This patch virtualizes & untangles the bioops operations vector.
Background:
The bioops
amp wrote:
>
> This patch virtualizes & untangles the bioops operations vector.
>
> Background:
>
> The bioops operation vector is a list of OO-like operations which can
> be performed on struct buf. They are used by the softupdates code
> to handle dependencies.
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Luoqi Chen write
s:
>> Background:
>> Ideally struct buf should have had a real OO like operations vector
>> like vnodes have it, and struct bioops is the first step towards that.
>>
>struct buf will eventually become merely an io
> Background:
>
> The bioops operation vector is a list of OO-like operations which can
> be performed on struct buf. They are used by the softupdates code
> to handle dependencies.
>
> Ideally struct buf should have had a real OO like operations vector
> like vnodes ha
This patch virtualizes & untangles the bioops operations vector.
Background:
The bioops operation vector is a list of OO-like operations which can
be performed on struct buf. They are used by the softupdates code
to handle dependencies.
Ideally struct buf should have had a real OO
