Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-07-16 Thread Munish Chopra
for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-undermydesk-freebsd"... panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy panic messages: --- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0xc227e6f4 fault code = supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer

Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-07-15 Thread Munish Chopra
. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-undermydesk-freebsd"... panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy panic messages: --- panic: bad pte syncing disks... panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy Uptime: 3h37m11s

Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-07-15 Thread Munish Chopra
to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-undermydesk-freebsd"... panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy panic messages: --- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual add

panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-07-14 Thread Munish Chopra
I've been having inexplicable crashes for a while and finally got around to getting a debug kernel and checking out what's going on, so here goes (apologies for the ^M's and all, I scripted a gdb session and that's what I got...): panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy panic m

Re: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-07-12 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 22:18:35 +0100, Ian Dowse wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrey A. Chernov" writes: > >I see this panic constantly during last month or two, UP machine, no > >softupdates. Anybody else saw it too? Any ideas? > > The "buffer is not busy" panic is usually a secon

Re: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-07-12 Thread Terry Lambert
"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote: > I see this panic constantly during last month or two, UP machine, no > softupdates. Anybody else saw it too? Any ideas? Lazy #$@&*% buffer! -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-07-12 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Ian Dowse writes: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrey A. Chernov" writes: > >I see this panic constantly during last month or two, UP machine, no > >softupdates. Anybody else saw it too? Any ideas? > > The "buffer is not busy" panic is usually a secondary panic that > occurs while t

Re: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-07-12 Thread Ian Dowse
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrey A. Chernov" writes: >I see this panic constantly during last month or two, UP machine, no >softupdates. Anybody else saw it too? Any ideas? The "buffer is not busy" panic is usually a secondary panic that occurs while trying to sync the disks after a diffe

Re: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-07-12 Thread Erik Greenwald
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:25:35PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > I see this panic constantly during last month or two, UP machine, no > softupdates. Anybody else saw it too? Any ideas? > I've been seeing it, when I'm lucky :) I get weird issues when mplayer is doing its thing with the sdl b

bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-07-12 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
I see this panic constantly during last month or two, UP machine, no softupdates. Anybody else saw it too? Any ideas? -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-11 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On 10 Feb, Bruce Evans wrote: > > This is a well known bug in the device layer. I reported it on > > 2001/12/26 and fixed it locally a little later. See the thread in > > -current about "panic during fdisk'ing a md(4) device" for patches.

Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-11 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On 10 Feb, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > >> On 09-Feb-02 Mikhail Teterin wrote: >> > While attempting to ``fdisk fd0.1440''. Or ``fdisk fd0''. Or >> > ``newfs_msdos fd0.1440'' with or without the floppy inside :-\ With >> > todays or Jan 3rd kernel (my prev

panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-11 Thread Mikhail Teterin
While attempting to ``fdisk fd0.1440''. Or ``fdisk fd0''. Or ``newfs_msdos fd0.1440'' with or without the floppy inside :-\ With todays or Jan 3rd kernel (my previous upgrade). IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x004ed000 initial pcb at physical address 0x00411560 panicst

Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-11 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On 10 Feb, Bruce Evans wrote: > > This is a well known bug in the device layer. I reported it on > > 2001/12/26 and fixed it locally a little later. See the thread in > > -current about "panic during fdisk'ing a md(4) device" for patches.

Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes: > >On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > >> > > >> > This is a well known bug in the device layer. I reported it on 2001/12/26 > >> > and fi

Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-10 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On 10 Feb, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > >> On 09-Feb-02 Mikhail Teterin wrote: >> > While attempting to ``fdisk fd0.1440''. Or ``fdisk fd0''. Or >> > ``newfs_msdos fd0.1440'' with or without the floppy inside :-\ With >> > todays or Jan 3rd kernel (my prev

Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-09 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes: >On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: >> >> > >> > This is a well known bug in the device layer. I reported it on 2001/12/26 >> > and fixed it locally a little later. See the thread in -current

RE: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-09 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > > > This is a well known bug in the device layer. I reported it on 2001/12/26 > > and fixed it locally a little later. See the thread in -current about > > "panic during fdisk'ing a md(4) device" for patc

RE: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-09 Thread Julian Elischer
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > > This is a well known bug in the device layer. I reported it on 2001/12/26 > and fixed it locally a little later. See the thread in -current about > "panic during fdisk'ing a md(4) device" for patches. > Can you commit the fix? To Unsubscribe: s

RE: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-09 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > On 09-Feb-02 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > While attempting to ``fdisk fd0.1440''. Or ``fdisk fd0''. Or > > ``newfs_msdos fd0.1440'' with or without the floppy inside :-\ > > With todays or Jan 3rd kernel (my previous upgrade). > > Only use fdisk on hard dis

RE: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-09 Thread John Baldwin
ill it shouldn't panic. The bdwrite is just extra garbage, the real panic is due to a NULL pointer dereference: > IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x004ed000 > initial pcb at physical address 0x00411560 > panicstr: bdwrite: buffer is not busy > panic messages: > --- > Fatal

panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-09 Thread Mikhail Teterin
While attempting to ``fdisk fd0.1440''. Or ``fdisk fd0''. Or ``newfs_msdos fd0.1440'' with or without the floppy inside :-\ With todays or Jan 3rd kernel (my previous upgrade). IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x004ed000 initial pcb at physical address 0x00411560 panicst