Re: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done" (5.1-CURRENT, IBMT30)

2003-10-14 Thread Lee Damon
ing, then built. Between that and the 1.9 version of ata-queue.c, both of the problems (the hang with ata1: resetting and the hang if atapicam is defined in the kernel) I had been reporting have been cleared up. Now if I could just get this darned T30 to sleep properly, all

Re: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done" (5.1-CURRENT, IBMT30)

2003-10-14 Thread Jacek Serwatynski
Dnia Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:51:43PM -0700, Lee Damon napisal: > > Anyone tried going forward to 1.8? > > I just tried 1.8, it did not fix the problem. Symtoms are still the same, I use 1.8 and is working without problem. -- Jacek Serwatynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | PGP_key: www.trynet.eu.org/pub

Re: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done" (5.1-CURRENT, IBMT30)

2003-10-13 Thread Lee Damon
> Anyone tried going forward to 1.8? I just tried 1.8, it did not fix the problem. Symtoms are still the same, > > ad0: 35174MB [71465/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 > > ata1: resetting devices .. > > done Going back to 1.6 (apparently) does fix the problem. nomad

Re: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done" (5.1-CURRENT, IBM T30)

2003-10-13 Thread Soren Schmidt
t; ad0: 35174MB [71465/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 > > ata1: resetting devices .. > > done > > > > Backing out the most recent checkin to sys/dev/ata/ata-queue.c (i.e. > > reverting to version 1.6) makes the problem go away. > > I upgraded from an Oct 1 ->

Re: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done"(5.1-CURRENT,IBMT30)

2003-10-12 Thread Rob MacGregor
From: "Rob MacGregor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Same result for me as with 1.7. I've just grabbed 1.6 and am rebuilding to confirm that that's the last working version for me too. Backing out to 1.6 fixes the problem for me too... Please DO NOT send me ANY email directly unless it's a privacy issue.

Re: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done" (5.1-CURRENT,IBMT30)

2003-10-12 Thread Rob MacGregor
From: "Steve Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Anyone tried going forward to 1.8? Same result for me as with 1.7. I've just grabbed 1.6 and am rebuilding to confirm that that's the last working version for me too. Please DO NOT send me ANY email directly unless it's a privacy issue. Reply-to man

Re: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done" (5.1-CURRENT, IBMT30)

2003-10-12 Thread Steve Ames
> > > Backing out the most recent checkin to sys/dev/ata/ata-queue.c (i.e. > > > reverting to version 1.6) makes the problem go away. > > > > I upgraded from an Oct 1 -> Oct 12 kernel and saw the same hang. > > Backing out r1.6 fixed it for me too. > > > "me too" Anyone tried going forward to 1.8?

Re: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done" (5.1-CURRENT, IBM T30)

2003-10-12 Thread Kenneth Culver
gt; > > ad0: 35174MB [71465/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 > > ata1: resetting devices .. > > done > > > > Backing out the most recent checkin to sys/dev/ata/ata-queue.c (i.e. > > reverting to version 1.6) makes the problem go away. > > I upgraded from an

Re: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done" (5.1-CURRENT, IBM T30)

2003-10-12 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Oct 08), Robert Ferguson said: > I see this problem as well. I'm running on a T40, with a DVD/CDRW in > the ultrabay, and -CURRENT as of this morning. At boot, it hangs > immediately after > > ad0: 35174MB [71465/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 >

RE: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done" (5.1-CURRENT, IBM T30)

2003-10-08 Thread Robert Ferguson
I see this problem as well. I'm running on a T40, with a DVD/CDRW in the ultrabay, and -CURRENT as of this morning. At boot, it hangs immediately after ad0: 35174MB [71465/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 ata1: resetting devices .. done Backing out the most recent checkin to sys/dev/at

boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done" (5.1-CURRENT, IBM T30)

2003-10-07 Thread Lee Damon
MA100 ata1: resetting devices .. done Then it hangs so hard I have to power cycle it to get the system to notice me. The hang does not happen if the DVD/CD-RW drive is pulled from the system. Booting an old kernel (previous to this problem) and searching the logs, I see: O

Re: ATAng: ata1-slave CDRW is only sometimes detected - RESOLVED

2003-09-10 Thread Lefteris Chatzibarbas
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 08:37:17PM +0300, Lefteris Chatzibarbas wrote: > [...] > > Most of the time the CDRW drive is not detected and I get: > > [...] After today's commit to src/sys/dev/ata/ata-lowlevel.c (1.11 2003/09/10 09:57:16 sos), the ata1-slave CDRW is alway

Re: ATAng: ata1-slave CDRW is only sometimes detected

2003-09-09 Thread Lefteris Chatzibarbas
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 06:00:12PM +, Jens Rehsack wrote: > I detected a similar problem with yesterdays current, but giving > it a chance I detected I a had a loosely cable. ?! I had checked the cables and they are fine. I should add, that I have this problem for almost a week (since I adde

Re: ATAng: ata1-slave CDRW is only sometimes detected

2003-09-09 Thread Jens Rehsack
Lefteris Chatzibarbas wrote: Hello, I have the following units on a MSI KT4V (KT400/VT8235) motherboard (80pin cable is used for both primary and secondary controller): ata0-master: WDC WD800JB ATA-6 disk ata0-slave: ata1-master: TEAC DV-516E DVDROM drive ata1-slave: TEAC CD-W524E

ATAng: ata1-slave CDRW is only sometimes detected

2003-09-09 Thread Lefteris Chatzibarbas
Hello, I have the following units on a MSI KT4V (KT400/VT8235) motherboard (80pin cable is used for both primary and secondary controller): ata0-master: WDC WD800JB ATA-6 disk ata0-slave: ata1-master: TEAC DV-516E DVDROM drive ata1-slave: TEAC CD-W524E CDRW drive For about a week

Mount ATAPI CD: panic [Re: fdc0 and ata1 issues]

2000-09-25 Thread Szilveszter Adam
up on things. After a make world and a kernel upgrade today, the floppy works again. (Thaks, Soren!) But, there is a new fun spot: this time on ata1. If I attempt to mount a CD (the CD-ROM is on ata1 as master) then it produces an instant panic (page fault.) (Up till now it just "simply&qu

Re: fdc0 and ata1 issues

2000-09-23 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Donn Miller wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > I am also seeing the fdc0 problem "fdc0: cannot reserve I/O port range". > > What's up with the fdc driver? I'm seeing the exact same thing. There was > never any heads-up about this. Surely, the person who broke

Re: fdc0 and ata1 issues

2000-09-23 Thread Donn Miller
t v1.2 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 isab0: at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xd000-0xd00f,0xd400-0xd403,0xd800-0xd807,0xe000-0xe003,0xe400-0xe407 irq 11 at device 1.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170

Re: fdc0 and ata1 issues

2000-09-22 Thread Szilveszter Adam
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 09:48:42AM -0500, Mark Hittinger wrote: > > I am also seeing the fdc0 problem "fdc0: cannot reserve I/O port range". I am also seeing this with a kernel and world from today... also, are there any issues with mount_cd9660? When I issue the following command: # mount -t c

fdc0 and ata1 issues

2000-09-22 Thread Mark Hittinger
I am also seeing the fdc0 problem "fdc0: cannot reserve I/O port range". The same kernel that I began to see the fdc0 problems I also lost the ability to use devices on ata1. Ata1 seems to probe OK but I get I/O errors on the ata1 drives all of a sudden. A kernel from a week ago is

Re: ata1

2000-02-07 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Klaus Herrmann wrote: > > ad0: 6197MB [12592/16/63] at ata0-master using UDMA33 > [ata1-master: piomode=4 dmamode=2 udmamode=-1 dmaflag=1] > [ata1-master: success setting up WDMA2 mode on VIA chip] > ata1-master: CDROM device - NO DRIVER! > > Fatal trap 12

Re: ata1

2000-02-06 Thread Klaus Herrmann
> > options ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA#Enable DMA on ATAPI devices > > Try removing this. According to the warning in LINT, this breaks many > CDROMs. > i alreadya tried that - no change. as said, this crash appears even when booting from boot floppies or generic. regards, Klaus --

Re: ata1

2000-02-06 Thread Klaus Herrmann
4.0-dmesg: ad0: 6197MB [12592/16/63] at ata0-master using UDMA33 [ata1-master: piomode=4 dmamode=2 udmamode=-1 dmaflag=1] [ata1-master: success setting up WDMA2 mode on VIA chip] ata1-master: CDROM device - NO DRIVER! Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode the lines in [bracke

Re: ata1

2000-02-05 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, Klaus Herrmann wrote: > options ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA#Enable DMA on ATAPI devices Try removing this. According to the warning in LINT, this breaks many CDROMs. Kris "How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?" "Eight!" "That was a rhetoric

Re: ata1

2000-02-05 Thread Thierry Herbelot
> > I just upgraded my 3.4-Stable system to a 4.0-current. It is running fine > - with one exeption: the kernel seems to have problems with my 2nd ide/ata > controller. when it is enabled, the system displays at boot time that it > cannot find a driver vor the CDROM-Drive on ata1. >

ata1

2000-02-05 Thread Klaus Herrmann
Hello! I just upgraded my 3.4-Stable system to a 4.0-current. It is running fine - with one exeption: the kernel seems to have problems with my 2nd ide/ata controller. when it is enabled, the system displays at boot time that it cannot find a driver vor the CDROM-Drive on ata1. On the 2nd ide

Re: ata1: unwanted interrupt

1999-03-04 Thread S�ren Schmidt
It seems Alex Zepeda wrote: > On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, oZZ!!! wrote: > > >What exactly is 'unwanted interrupt' supposed to mean, and is it > > > likely to be a problem in my kernel configuration? (I can send a copy > > > of it on request...) > > i think it tell you about not used 2nd IDE controller

Re: ata1: unwanted interrupt

1999-03-03 Thread D. Rock
> > Am I confused (yet again)? > >Yes ;-) > >I mean the time it takes to actually detect the drive. I recently added options IDE_DELAY=2000 on all IDE kernels I managed. The only problem with this short delay so far was an undetected drive in an unusual configuration: The jumper b

Re: ata1: unwanted interrupt

1999-03-03 Thread D. Rock
> >After having CVSupped to the latest 4.0-CURRENT tree > > (just now), I noticed the amazing speed of the new ATA driver. > > The amazing speed of the new ATA driver? Were you using 32 bit transfers > and multi-sector IO with the older driver? > > I assumed from the benchmarks posted that I

Re: ata1: unwanted interrupt

1999-03-03 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, oZZ!!! wrote: > >What exactly is 'unwanted interrupt' supposed to mean, and is it > > likely to be a problem in my kernel configuration? (I can send a copy > > of it on request...) > i think it tell you about not used 2nd IDE controller... Nope. I've got three IDE/ATAPI d

Re: ata1: unwanted interrupt

1999-03-03 Thread Chris Costello
On Wed, Mar 3, 1999, oZZ!!! put this into my mailbox: > i think it tell you about not used 2nd IDE controller... Nope, my CD ROM is on the second IDE controller ... -Chris -- Powered by FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT. "The Power to Serve!" int main(int m){main(!main(0));} To Un

Re: ata1: unwanted interrupt

1999-03-03 Thread oZZ!!!
On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Chris Costello wrote: >After having CVSupped to the latest 4.0-CURRENT tree > (just now), I noticed the amazing speed of the new ATA driver. > > BUT > > I noticed something in dmesg... > > ata1: unwanted interrupt > ad0: ATA-3 disk at a

Re: ata1: unwanted interrupt

1999-03-03 Thread Chris Costello
On Wed, Mar 3, 1999, Sheldon Hearn put this into my mailbox: > > > On Wed, 03 Mar 1999 16:06:19 CST, Chris Costello wrote: > > >After having CVSupped to the latest 4.0-CURRENT tree > > (just now), I noticed the amazing speed of the new ATA driver. > > The amazing speed of the new ATA driver

Re: ata1: unwanted interrupt

1999-03-03 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Wed, 03 Mar 1999 16:06:19 CST, Chris Costello wrote: >After having CVSupped to the latest 4.0-CURRENT tree > (just now), I noticed the amazing speed of the new ATA driver. The amazing speed of the new ATA driver? Were you using 32 bit transfers and multi-sector IO with the older driver?

ata1: unwanted interrupt

1999-03-03 Thread Chris Costello
After having CVSupped to the latest 4.0-CURRENT tree (just now), I noticed the amazing speed of the new ATA driver. BUT I noticed something in dmesg... ata1: unwanted interrupt ad0: ATA-3 disk at ata0 as master ad0: 3090MB (6330240 sectors), 6280 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S ad0: 16 secs