On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I guess the support is in gcc as Linux and solaris use it, but
> is our linker close enough to what they use to be able to benefit at all
> from them?
We'll need an updated GCC at the very least; I see some stuff in binutils
regarding TLS. I think we'
see my answer to you there..
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:34:15PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > Ok, so having thrashed out what is required on the threads list
> > (and severely strained (but hopefully not permanently) our relations
> > wit
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:34:15PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Ok, so having thrashed out what is required on the threads list
> (and severely strained (but hopefully not permanently) our relations
> with the OpenGL folks) we've figured out that we do need to support
> __thread (if we don'
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I guess the support is in gcc as Linux and solaris use it, but
> is our linker close enough to what they use to be able to benefit at
> all from them?
>
The __thread support is available in GCC 3.3+ only. The
Ok, so having thrashed out what is required on the threads list
(and severely strained (but hopefully not permanently) our relations
with the OpenGL folks) we've figured out that we do need to support
__thread (if we don't we'll miss out on alot).
I have basicaly worked out what we need to do
