Hi!
It seems, I've found a bug in the ZFS v28 on the latest stable:
if we have a snapshot with some files having an extended attributes,
then attempt to read an extended attributes's value leads to a well
reproducible kernel panic.
The part of backtrace follows:
#6 0x8
On 16/04/2011 00:26, George Kontostanos wrote:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/stable-8-zfsv28-20110317.patch.xz
>>
>> This patch failes at sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h which i
>> think should just be deleted. I tried deleting this file and then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leon Meßner wrote:
| On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:28:07PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
|> I was wondering if ZFS v28 is going to be MFC to 8-Stable or not.
|
| On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:28:07PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
|> I was won
I think that at this point it takes more than a patch. That is way I am
asking if there is a plan to MFC to 8-Stable.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Leon Meßner
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:28:07PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
> > I was wondering if ZFS v28 is going to be
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:28:07PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
> I was wondering if ZFS v28 is going to be MFC to 8-Stable or not.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:28:07PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
> I was wondering if ZFS v28 is going to be MFC to 8-Stable or not.
Is there a recent
I was wondering if ZFS v28 is going to be MFC to 8-Stable or not.
Regards,
--
George Kontostanos
aisecure.net <http://www.aisecure.net>
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-curr
2011/2/2 Christopher Olsen :
> Pawel,
>
> I have the latest current source and I patched with your zfs patch from
> zfs_20101213.patch and I am having trouble compiling my kernel.. Is there a
> more current patch to work with the latest –CURRENT source?
An answer from yesterday (working for me t
Pawel,
I have the latest current source and I patched with your zfs patch from
zfs_20101213.patch and I am having trouble compiling my kernel.. Is there a
more current patch to work with the latest –CURRENT source?
-Christopher
___
freebsd-cur
to be top-notch, and right now I'm only
raising issues that aren't exact enough to work on.
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chris Forgeron
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 3:09 PM
To: Pawel Jak
>Before we go any further could you please confirm that you commented out this
>line in sys/modules/zfs/Makefile:
>
> CFLAGS+=-DDEBUG=1
>
>This turns all kind of ZFS debugging and slows it down a lot, but for the
>correctness testing is invaluable. This will >be turned off once we import ZF
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:03:19PM -0400, Chris Forgeron wrote:
> I've been testing out the v28 patch code for a month now, and I've yet to
> report any real issues other than what is mentioned below.
>
> I'll detail some of the things I've tested, hopefully the stability of v28 in
> FreeBSD wi
I've been testing out the v28 patch code for a month now, and I've yet to
report any real issues other than what is mentioned below.
I'll detail some of the things I've tested, hopefully the stability of v28 in
FreeBSD will convince others to give it a try so the final release of v28 will
be a
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 07:28:15PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
>
> Hello,
>
> Any status update on this ? I regularly check
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/ to see if there's an updated
> version of your patch. 2 m
2010/8/31 Pawel Jakub Dawidek :
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
>
> The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
> teddy bear, so be warned. Don't try it for an
On 09/02/10 17:48, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:59:15PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
[...]
Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
Now it is even easier to test ne
Hi,
I have just imported your VirtualBox appliance,
created some zpool and wanted to try *dedup* on
FreeBSD, but while I was able to enable *dedup*,
I was not able to check *dedupratio* because
that 'property' is not available, on OpenSolaris
it looked like that:
# zpool get dedupratio pool
NAME
Seems to not work properly, at least as implemented in the nginx web
server (specifically www/nginx-devel from ports).
I have "sendfile on;" in my nginx.conf and files served from a ZFS
filesystem are garbled in seemingly random ways (their md5 changes
every time). Shutting it off resolves the pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010/09/09 16:15, Matthew Fleming wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Xin LI wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 2010/09/09 15:33, Xin LI wrote:
>>> On 2010/09/09 15:28, Rob Farmer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Xin LI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2010/09/09 15:33, Xin LI wrote:
>> On 2010/09/09 15:28, Rob Farmer wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 15:14, Xin LI wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 16:04, Xin LI wrote:
> Note that on my kernel I have bumped FULLGRAPH_SBUF_SIZE to 131072 in
> /sys/kern/subr_witness.c. I'm not sure if it's related but without that
> I used get a few panics in the past.
I have no idea what that does. Is it something you would recommend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010/09/09 15:33, Xin LI wrote:
> On 2010/09/09 15:28, Rob Farmer wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 15:14, Xin LI wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> Hi, Rob,
>>>
>>> On 2010/09/09 15:01, Rob Farmer wrote:
>>> [.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010/09/09 15:28, Rob Farmer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 15:14, Xin LI wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Hi, Rob,
>>
>> On 2010/09/09 15:01, Rob Farmer wrote:
>> [...]
Just a guess - are you compiling und
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 15:14, Xin LI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi, Rob,
>
> On 2010/09/09 15:01, Rob Farmer wrote:
> [...]
>>> Just a guess - are you compiling under X? If so what about if you
>>> compile under text mode?
>>
>> Nope - this is a new install and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi, Rob,
On 2010/09/09 15:01, Rob Farmer wrote:
[...]
>> Just a guess - are you compiling under X? If so what about if you
>> compile under text mode?
>
> Nope - this is a new install and X isn't running yet. It is installed,
> but not started yet
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 14:56, Xin LI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2010/09/09 14:51, Rob Farmer wrote:
>> I am running a fairly recent current with the new ZFS patches:
>>
>> FreeBSD topaz.predatorlabs.net 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0
>> r212312M: Wed Sep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010/09/09 14:51, Rob Farmer wrote:
> I am running a fairly recent current with the new ZFS patches:
>
> FreeBSD topaz.predatorlabs.net 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0
> r212312M: Wed Sep 8 02:03:34 PDT 2010
> rfar...@topaz.predatorlabs.net:/
I am running a fairly recent current with the new ZFS patches:
FreeBSD topaz.predatorlabs.net 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0
r212312M: Wed Sep 8 02:03:34 PDT 2010
rfar...@topaz.predatorlabs.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TOPAZ amd64
When I try to build databases/mysql51-client from ports, the con
tuska wrote / napísal(a):
>> Hi everyone,
>> I have put together a slightly improved patch of Pawel's that compiles
>> correctly and supports booting from ZFS v19 pools.
>>
>> You can download the patch here:
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/head-zf
Wiadomość napisana przez Anonymous w dniu 2010-09-05, o godz. 20:56:
> Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
>> mad, you can stop here.
> [...]
>> So test whatever y
ownload the patch here:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/head-zfs-v28-20100831.patch
>
> For users who don't want to compile I have created a mfsBSD ISO image
> with a zfs-only install of 9-CURRENT-amd64:
> http://mfsbsd.vx.sk/iso/mfsbsd-se-head-zfsv28-amd64.iso
>
> You can read m
Hi everyone,
I have put together a slightly improved patch of Pawel's that compiles
correctly and supports booting from ZFS v19 pools.
You can download the patch here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/head-zfs-v28-20100831.patch
For users who don't want to compile I have
Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
[...]
> So test whatever you can and report back. Look for regressions,
> strange behaviour,
I wonder why new files tend to have
I got this compile error agains todays current patched with patch -p0 -E <
/usr/src9/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_ioctl.c:
In function 'zfs_ioc_recv':
/usr/src9/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_ioctl.c:3586:
error: too fe
On 09/03/2010 13:02, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 04:50:44PM +0100, Peter Molnar, BSD wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I would like to try ZFS + VirtualBox but I have got problems:
>>
>>
>> 1) Linux 2.6.32-24-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 20 14:21:58 UTC 2010
>> x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> I t
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 07:02:41PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Exporting appliances is a bit broken (if you have more than one disk, it
> will point all disks at the last one from configuration), so I had to
> edit .ovf file manually to fix this. Maybe I messed something up, but I
> was ab
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 04:50:44PM +0100, Peter Molnar, BSD wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to try ZFS + VirtualBox but I have got problems:
>
>
> 1) Linux 2.6.32-24-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 20 14:21:58 UTC 2010
> x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> I tried import that file in my VirtualBox but I have got
On 09/03/2010 11:50, Peter Molnar, BSD wrote:
> Requires 32-bit libraries installed under /usr/lib32.
> Do: cd /usr/src; make build32 install32; ldconfig -v -m -R /usr/lib32
Did you happen to see the above ?
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
On 03/09/10 16:50, Peter Molnar, BSD wrote:
On 02/09/10 22:48, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:59:15PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
[...]
Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.pat
On 02/09/10 22:48, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:59:15PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
[...]
Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
Now it is even easier t
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 23:57, jhell wrote:
> On 09/02/2010 04:55, Rob Farmer wrote:
>>
>> I tried applying the patch to r212087 to rule out recent changes to
>> dtrace, but it made no difference. I used patch -E -p0 < patch.
>>
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> I see that in your build error are a bunch of things t
On 09/02/2010 04:55, Rob Farmer wrote:
>
> I tried applying the patch to r212087 to rule out recent changes to
> dtrace, but it made no difference. I used patch -E -p0 < patch.
>
Hi Rob,
I see that in your build error are a bunch of things to do with atomic.h
and I recalled a patch from pjd@ on
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:59:15PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
[...]
> Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
Now it is even easier to test new ZFS! :)
Here you can find VirtualBox Applia
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>
> Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
>
buildworld on i386 (yes I know ZFS isn't ideal there):
===> cddl/lib/libdtrace (all)
cc
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 01:55:51AM -0700, Rob Farmer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> >
> > Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
> >
>
> buildworld o
On 09/01/2010 10:28, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 August 2010 16:59:15 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
>> mad, you can stop here.
>>
>> The patchset is very experi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010/09/01 07:28, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 August 2010 16:59:15 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
>> mad, you can stop
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:59:15PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
Important note. Please patch with the following command:
# patch -E -p0 < z
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/31/2010 17:59, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
>
> The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and
On Tuesday 31 August 2010 16:59:15 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
>
> The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
> teddy bear, so b
Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
[...]
> So test whatever you can and report back. Look for regressions, strange
> behaviour, missing features, deadlocks, livelocks, preformance
&
ards,
> hanzhu
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
>> mad, you can stop here.
>>
>> The patchset is very experimental. It can e
That's cool. Thank you for your work on it.
best regards,
hanzhu
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
>
> The patchset is very e
Infiniband is currently being worked on, sponsored by Panasas, Isilon
and someone else. It's coming along pretty well.
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/ZFS-as-a-Linux-kernel-module-1069056.html
Too bad FreeBSD still lacks Infiniband support. Currently we use ZFS
on FreeBSD and Infin
Pawel,
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
mad, you can stop here.
The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
teddy bear, so be warned. Don't try it for anything except testing.
Thank you
This is awesome. Thank you!
-J
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
>
> The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hur
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
Woohoo! Thanks for all your hard work on this!
Matt
__
Hello.
I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
mad, you can stop here.
The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
teddy bear, so be warned. Don't try it for anything except testing.
This patchset is also a message we, as t
57 matches
Mail list logo
