Re: ZFS Cache & Log Device Failure Handling

2010-09-03 Thread Jason J. W. Williams
Hi Olivier, Removal came around 18, but at least in OpenSolaris failure of the device (and it's replacement) were handled from day one of the dedicated ZIL feature. -J On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Olivier Smedts wrote: > 2010/9/3 Alexander Leidinger : >> Quoting "Jason J. W. Williams" (from

Re: ZFS Cache & Log Device Failure Handling

2010-09-03 Thread Olivier Smedts
2010/9/3 Alexander Leidinger : > Quoting "Jason J. W. Williams" (from Thu, 2 Sep > 2010 13:30:51 -0600): > >> How well does ZFS on FreeBSD handle a dying/wedged log and/or cache >> device? OpenSolaris handles this pretty well in my experience and will >> fail through relatively quickly. But this t

Re: ZFS Cache & Log Device Failure Handling

2010-09-03 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting "Jason J. W. Williams" (from Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:30:51 -0600): How well does ZFS on FreeBSD handle a dying/wedged log and/or cache device? OpenSolaris handles this pretty well in my experience and will fail through relatively quickly. But this tends to rely on FMA. Thank you in advance

ZFS Cache & Log Device Failure Handling

2010-09-02 Thread Jason J. W. Williams
Hi Guys, How well does ZFS on FreeBSD handle a dying/wedged log and/or cache device? OpenSolaris handles this pretty well in my experience and will fail through relatively quickly. But this tends to rely on FMA. Thank you in advance. -J ___ freebsd-curr