* Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021108 05:29] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, G
> erald Pfeifer writes:
>
> >Sheesh.
> >
> >PHK, now we have the situation where user programs require #ifdefs
> >to be portable among the BSDs when this was not required before.
> >
> >Please conside
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, G
erald Pfeifer writes:
>Sheesh.
>
>PHK, now we have the situation where user programs require #ifdefs
>to be portable among the BSDs when this was not required before.
>
>Please consider reverting
That has been considered, and I don't think it is a sensible soluti
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> Fine, but if included "as is" in Wine because, it will break
> compatibility with Net/OpenBSD because DBREG_DRX is a FreeBSDism...
> that's why I surrounded my patch with a #ifdef DBREG_DRX (which
> seems cleaner than a #ifdef __FreeBSD__).
Sheesh.
PHK,
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 02:04:01PM +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> Fine, but if included "as is" in Wine because, it will break
> compatibility with Net/OpenBSD because DBREG_DRX is a FreeBSDism...
Sorry for the phrasing, remove the spurious "because" to make sense
of it :)
--
Pierre Beyssac
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 12:08:32PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Unfortunately (in the sense that both of you duplicated effort),
> Alfred independently came up with a similiar patch which went in as
> $PORTSDIR/emulators/wine/files/patch-context_i386
> and which I already fed upstream to the Wi
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
>> As for source compatibility, just use the DBREG_DRX macro, which exists
>> in both -STABLE and -CURRENT (it was merged into -STABLE two years ago).
> It's too bad source compatibility hasn't been preserved.
Indeed.
> Argument d is not properly parenthe
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 05:29:39PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> That revision doesn't change the structure, just how it is defined, so
> binary compatibility is not an issue. As for source compatibility,
> just use the DBREG_DRX macro, which exists in both -STABLE and
> -CURRENT (it was mer
Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Poul-Henning, your patch to src/sys/i386/include/reg.h
>
> revision 1.28
> date: 2002/10/20 20:48:56; author: phk; state: Exp; lines: +6 -9
> Change the definition of the debugging registers to be an array, so
> that we can index into it, rath
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Krzysztof [iso-8859-2] Jêdruczyk wrote:
> Yesterday I tried to upgrade wine on my FreeBSD-current box. It didn't
> compile until I changed following in server/context_i386.c (looks like
> this is because of commit of 1.28 version of src/sys/i386/include/reg.h)
Thanks for the h
Hi,
Yesterday I tried to upgrade wine on my FreeBSD-current box. It didn't
compile until I changed following in server/context_i386.c (looks like
this is because of commit of 1.28 version of src/sys/i386/include/reg.h)
--8<---cut here---start->8---
--- context_
10 matches
Mail list logo
