gt;
>>> > There's been lots of requests to have VirtIO in GENERIC for i386 and
>>> > amd64. Anybody have any issues or concerns with this or the patch at
>>> > [1]. This also removes the kludge that was introduced in r239009.
>>> >
>>> &g
On 12/17/12 00:06, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On 17 December 2012 18:06, Jim Harris wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>>
>>> On 17 December 2012 13:17, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
>>>
>>>> There's b
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On 17 December 2012 18:06, Jim Harris wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Thompson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 17 December 2012 13:17, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
>&g
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Jim Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Thompson
> wrote:
>>
>> On 17 December 2012 13:17, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
>>
>> > There's been lots of requests to have VirtIO in GENERIC for i38
On 17 December 2012 18:06, Jim Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>
>> On 17 December 2012 13:17, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
>>
>> > There's been lots of requests to have VirtIO in GENERIC for i386 and
>> >
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On 17 December 2012 13:17, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
>
> > There's been lots of requests to have VirtIO in GENERIC for i386 and
> > amd64. Anybody have any issues or concerns with this or the patch at
> > [1].
On 17 December 2012 13:17, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
> There's been lots of requests to have VirtIO in GENERIC for i386 and
> amd64. Anybody have any issues or concerns with this or the patch at
> [1]. This also removes the kludge that was introduced in r239009.
>
> I've c
There's been lots of requests to have VirtIO in GENERIC for i386 and
amd64. Anybody have any issues or concerns with this or the patch at
[1]. This also removes the kludge that was introduced in r239009.
I've compiled LINT for i386 and amd64 so hopefully there won't be any
surprise
