On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 11:08:54PM -0800, William Woods wrote:
> > It did, although I did eventually remake them.
> >
> > I did:
> > mv /dev /dev.old
> > mkdir /dev
> > cp /usr/src/etc/MAKE* /dev
> > sh MAKEDEV all
>
> This makes sence
>
> > I also had to make the partition entries for my I
> It did, although I did eventually remake them.
>
> I did:
> mv /dev /dev.old
> mkdir /dev
> cp /usr/src/etc/MAKE* /dev
> sh MAKEDEV all
This makes sence
> I also had to make the partition entries for my IDE drive:
>
> sh MAKEDEV ad0s4a
Ahhok. So if my partitions are thus:
/dev/wd0s
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, William Woods wrote:
>
> On 23-Feb-00 R Joseph Wright wrote:
> >
> > make buildworld
> > make buildkernel &&make installkernel
> > Then reboot in single user mode
> > make -DNOINFO installworld
> > make buildkernel &&make installkernel (again)
> > make installworld
> >
> >
On 23-Feb-00 R Joseph Wright wrote:
>
> make buildworld
> make buildkernel &&make installkernel
> Then reboot in single user mode
> make -DNOINFO installworld
> make buildkernel &&make installkernel (again)
> make installworld
>
> This worked for me perfectly.
Hmmm.the only question I have
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * William Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000222 21:27] wrote:
> > I did read that document, and honestly, it dident make a lot of sence and it
> > seemed to have some conflicting instructions.which is why I am asking here.
>
> It looks pretty concis
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 09:03:04PM -0800, William Woods wrote:
> cvsupped a few hours ago..
> > Specifics, specifics... and are you sure you're looking at an
Specifics please.
--
Will Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V
Well, I guess what confused me is the order
I would assume that the last entry, being the newest, would have all the steps
listed that are currently needed. Maby its just me and, I am really not tyring
to cause a hassle, maby I am reading it wrong.
It seems to me that you need to piece toget
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> William Woods writes:
: I read that...I must say it is a bit confusing and in some places contradictory
I'm not surprising that it is confusing. It is hard to hit a moving
target like current. And things have often are contradictory...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: se
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 08:57:35PM -0800, William Woods wrote:
> > 4.0-CURRENT running with a 3Com 3CCFE574BT PC-Card. :-)
>
> I have that same card
Works great on 4.0-CURRENT, which I'm sure you'll be glad to know. If
you have any trouble getting it to work, just drop me a line and I'll
hel
* William Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000222 21:27] wrote:
> I did read that document, and honestly, it dident make a lot of sence and it
> seemed to have some conflicting instructions.which is why I am asking here.
It looks pretty concise to me, perhaps you can explain the confusion
so that w
cvsupped a few hours ago..
On 23-Feb-00 Will Andrews wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 08:54:14PM -0800, William Woods wrote:
>> I did read that document, and honestly, it dident make a lot of sence and it
>> seemed to have some conflicting instructions.which is why I am asking
>> here.
>
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 08:54:14PM -0800, William Woods wrote:
> I did read that document, and honestly, it dident make a lot of sence and it
> seemed to have some conflicting instructions.which is why I am asking here.
Specifics, specifics... and are you sure you're looking at an
_UP_TO_DATE
On 23-Feb-00 Will Andrews wrote:
> See src/UPDATING.
I read that...I must say it is a bit confusing and in some places contradictory
> I made the transition on my laptop from 3.3-RELEASE to 4.0-CURRENT about
> six months ago, so my experience wouldn't help you much, unfortunately.
>
> Howev
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 08:45:28PM -0800, William Woods wrote:
> I have been following the disscussions here for a while, just trying to get a
> feel of what the transition from 3.4-stable 4.0-release will be like. I am
> running -current on my alpha, but that was a fresh install. I am debating
>
I did read that document, and honestly, it dident make a lot of sence and it
seemed to have some conflicting instructions.which is why I am asking here.
On 23-Feb-00 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * William Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000222 21:19] wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I have been following the di
* William Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000222 21:19] wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have been following the disscussions here for a while, just trying to get a
> feel of what the transition from 3.4-stable 4.0-release will be like. I am
> running -current on my alpha, but that was a fresh install. I am debati
Hey,
I have been following the disscussions here for a while, just trying to get a
feel of what the transition from 3.4-stable 4.0-release will be like. I am
running -current on my alpha, but that was a fresh install. I am debating
trying -current on my laptop, but before we go there, I would lik
17 matches
Mail list logo
