Re: ULE nice bugs are fixed.

2003-06-18 Thread Wiktor Niesiobedzki
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 02:43:43AM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:51:32PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > > > > I am still not able to reproduce this. Can you update your sources? I > > > commited some code just no

Re: ULE nice bugs are fixed.

2003-06-18 Thread Terry Lambert
Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:51:32PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > I am still not able to reproduce this. Can you update your sources? I > > commited some code just now that removed an external dependency from > > sched_nice(). This should make it more robust. > Got

Re: ULE nice bugs are fixed.

2003-06-17 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:51:32PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > > I am still not able to reproduce this. Can you update your sources? I > > commited some code just now that removed an external dependency from > > sched_nice(). This should m

Re: ULE nice bugs are fixed.

2003-06-17 Thread Wiktor Niesiobedzki
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:51:32PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > I am still not able to reproduce this. Can you update your sources? I > commited some code just now that removed an external dependency from > sched_nice(). This should make it more robust. > With the new code, I'm also unable

Re: ULE nice bugs are fixed.

2003-06-17 Thread Wiktor Niesiobedzki
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:51:32PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > I am still not able to reproduce this. Can you update your sources? I > commited some code just now that removed an external dependency from > sched_nice(). This should make it more robust. Got it - its LAZY_SWITCH, without it -

Re: ULE nice bugs are fixed.

2003-06-17 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 02:53:36AM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > > > > The sources are from today. I also noticed, that 5.1-BETA (build around 9th of > > > May) is working correctly. > > > > > > Also: I've noticed a strange behaviour - if I do

Re: ULE nice bugs are fixed.

2003-06-17 Thread Wiktor Niesiobedzki
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 02:53:36AM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > I'm seeing quite similar panic, when I do renice to lower (negative) value: > > ("Negative nice count.") > > > > (kgdb) bt > > #0 doadump () at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:240 > > #1 0xc018b374 in boot (howto=260) at ../../../ke

Re: ULE nice bugs are fixed.

2003-06-16 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote: > I'm seeing quite similar panic, when I do renice to lower (negative) value: > ("Negative nice count.") > > (kgdb) bt > #0 doadump () at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:240 > #1 0xc018b374 in boot (howto=260) at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:372 >

Re: ULE nice bugs are fixed.

2003-06-16 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 04:40:17PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > > On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > > > > I started to recompile the kernel and while sitting here decided > > > to load linux-mozilla. The system rebooted before

Re: ULE nice bugs are fixed.

2003-06-16 Thread Wiktor Niesiobedzki
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 04:40:17PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > I started to recompile the kernel and while sitting here decided > > to load linux-mozilla. The system rebooted before linux-mozilla > > displayed a window. I'm not sure this ULE