On 2014/04/02 04:53, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi!
Hi Adrian,
On 31 March 2014 19:20, Kevin Lo wrote:
Thank you John. glebius@ suggests we don't need to have two absolutely
equal uma zones since most systems don't run UDP-Lite.
If practice shows that a differentiation at zone level between UD
Hi!
On 31 March 2014 19:20, Kevin Lo wrote:
>
> Thank you John. glebius@ suggests we don't need to have two absolutely
> equal uma zones since most systems don't run UDP-Lite.
> If practice shows that a differentiation at zone level between UDP and
> UDP-Lite PCBs is important, then it could b
On Monday, March 31, 2014 10:20:53 pm Kevin Lo wrote:
> On 2014/03/28 00:21, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 27, 2014 5:32:16 am Kevin Lo wrote:
> > Are you interested in working on these and report back?
> The revised patch is available at:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kev
Joe Nosay wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Kevin Lo wrote:
On 2014/03/28 00:21, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, March 27, 2014 5:32:16 am Kevin Lo wrote:
Are you interested in working on these and report back?
The revised patch is available at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/ud
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Kevin Lo wrote:
> On 2014/03/28 00:21, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, March 27, 2014 5:32:16 am Kevin Lo wrote:
>>
>>> Are you interested in working on these and report back?
>>
> The revised patch is available at:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~
On 2014/03/28 00:21, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, March 27, 2014 5:32:16 am Kevin Lo wrote:
Are you interested in working on these and report back?
The revised patch is available at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udplite.diff
Thank you for your suggestions.
A few suggestions:
- I wou
On Thursday, March 27, 2014 5:32:16 am Kevin Lo wrote:
> >>> Are you interested in working on these and report back?
> >> The revised patch is available at:
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udplite.diff
>
> Thank you for your suggestions.
>
> > A few suggestions:
> >
> > - I would just drop
On 2014/03/26 23:22, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, March 21, 2014 3:38:19 am Kevin Lo wrote:
On 2014/03/03 04:08, Xin Li wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 3/2/14, 10:42 AM, Joe Nosay wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Joe Nosay
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at
On Friday, March 21, 2014 3:38:19 am Kevin Lo wrote:
> On 2014/03/03 04:08, Xin Li wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > On 3/2/14, 10:42 AM, Joe Nosay wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Joe Nosay
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at
On 2014/03/03 04:08, Xin Li wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 3/2/14, 10:42 AM, Joe Nosay wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Joe Nosay
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Xin Li
wrote:
On 02/26/14 18:52, Joe Nosay wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:19 PM
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Xi
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Xin Li wrote:
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA51
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Xin Li wrote:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA512
>>>
>>> On 3/2/14, 10:42 AM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Feb 27, 20
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Xin Li wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>> On 3/2/14, 10:42 AM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Joe Nosay
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Xin Li wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 3/2/14, 10:42 AM, Joe Nosay wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Joe Nosay
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Xin Li
> >> wrote:
> >>
> > On 02/26/14
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 3/2/14, 10:42 AM, Joe Nosay wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Joe Nosay
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Xin Li
>> wrote:
>>
> On 02/26/14 18:52, Joe Nosay wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Brooks
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Xin Li wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>> On 02/26/14 18:52, Joe Nosay wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Brooks Davis
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Xin Li wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 02/26/14 18:52, Joe Nosay wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Brooks Davis
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:36:29PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote:
> >>> The last thread on th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/26/14 18:52, Joe Nosay wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Brooks Davis
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:36:29PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote:
>>> The last thread on this was in 2006. Has it ever been
>>> reconsidered or is the likeli
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:36:29PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote:
> > The last thread on this was in 2006. Has it ever been reconsidered or is
> > the likelihood of too many damaged packets the reason for not supporting?
> > I'm not sure where to pu
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:36:29PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote:
> The last thread on this was in 2006. Has it ever been reconsidered or is
> the likelihood of too many damaged packets the reason for not supporting?
> I'm not sure where to put this question. Apologies for the noise.
You've provided next
The last thread on this was in 2006. Has it ever been reconsidered or is
the likelihood of too many damaged packets the reason for not supporting?
I'm not sure where to put this question. Apologies for the noise.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing li
22 matches
Mail list logo