Brian T.Schellenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/28/2002 05:07 AM
To: "Robert L Sowders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gregory Neil Shapiro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The
Folks, I hate to be snotty, but gosh, I don't think this thread really
belongs in a discussion about -stable. Bad enough that the sendmail
created so many "me too's" but wouldn't -chat be a better place for
california laws?
Sam
--
Just because you're moving fast | BURMA SHAVE
do
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Nate Williams wrote:
> > > (my company demands
> > > that all software I write, including in my own free time, is copyright by
> > > them)
> >
> > You need to move to California, where this is against the law.
>
> Every California company I've worked for has made me sign a st
On 2002-03-28 13:34, Nate Williams wrote:
> > > (my company demands
> > > that all software I write, including in my own free time, is copyright by
> > > them)
> >
> > You need to move to California, where this is against the law.
>
> Every California company I've worked for has made me ...
> ...w
Nate Williams wrote:
> > > (my company demands
> > > that all software I write, including in my own free time, is copyright by
> > > them)
> >
> > You need to move to California, where this is against the law.
>
> Every California company I've worked for has made me sign a statement
> with the ab
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> From: Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Matthew Whelan wrote:
> > > (my company demands
> > > that all software I write, including in my own free time, is copyright by
> > > them)
> >
> > You need to move to California, where this is against the law.
>
> Minor correctio
> > (my company demands
> > that all software I write, including in my own free time, is copyright by
> > them)
>
> You need to move to California, where this is against the law.
Every California company I've worked for has made me sign a statement
with the above stipulation. In order to avoid
> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:01:31 -0800
> From: Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Matthew Whelan wrote:
> > (my company demands
> > that all software I write, including in my own free time, is copyright by
> > them)
>
> You need to move to California, where this i
Matthew Whelan wrote:
> (my company demands
> that all software I write, including in my own free time, is copyright by
> them)
You need to move to California, where this is against the law.
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body o
28/03/2002 11:39:51, "Robert L Sowders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>These whiners, who constantly moan for code while never contributing any,
>should contribute the code if they want it changed.
Hmph. Inability to contribute - whether it be lack of necessary coding
knowledge, time constraints
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gregory Neil Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: 1. Convert FreeBSD into a bunch of packages and let binary installations
:with sysinstall (or some future installer) pick and chose or pick
:from a short list of "standard" systems. Offer altern
On Thursday 28 March 2002 06:39 am, Robert L Sowders wrote:
| Greg is absolutely correct.
|
| These whiners, who constantly moan for code while never contributing any,
| should contribute the code if they want it changed.
|
| Also I shudder to think that those who customize their systems would
| a
Robert L Sowders([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.03.28 03:39:51 +:
> Greg is absolutely correct.
yes, i agree
> These whiners, who constantly moan for code while never contributing any,
> should contribute the code if they want it changed.
being a terrible c-coder i have to admit that, after havi
Greg is absolutely correct.
These whiners, who constantly moan for code while never contributing any,
should contribute the code if they want it changed.
Also I shudder to think that those who customize their systems would
actually learn how to use all the tools available to them to prevent a
At 10:25 PM 3/27/2002 -0800, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
>I've been purposefully trying to avoid getting involved with the entire
>"should sendmail be in the base OS" debate as my input would obviously
>be biased. However, avoiding a response has become more and more
>difficult as I've seen unans
I've been purposefully trying to avoid getting involved with the entire
"should sendmail be in the base OS" debate as my input would obviously
be biased. However, avoiding a response has become more and more
difficult as I've seen unanswered questions, misinformation, and as of
late, people eithe
16 matches
Mail list logo
