Re: Tested wanted: BSD-licensed libgcc replacement, libcompiler_rt

2010-10-25 Thread Rene Ladan
On 22-10-2010 16:30, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hello everyone, > > At EuroBSDCon I was talking with some committers active in the area of > Clang (brooks, kwm, others) about replacing our libgcc shipped with GCC > 4.2.1 with a BSD-licensed version. The LLVM folks have a BSD licensed > implementation ca

Re: Tested wanted: BSD-licensed libgcc replacement, libcompiler_rt

2010-10-23 Thread Ed Schouten
Hi all, * Ed Schouten , 20101022 16:30: > At EuroBSDCon I was talking with some committers active in the area of > Clang (brooks, kwm, others) about replacing our libgcc shipped with GCC > 4.2.1 with a BSD-licensed version. The LLVM folks have a BSD licensed > implementation called libcompiler_rt.

Re: Tested wanted: BSD-licensed libgcc replacement, libcompiler_rt

2010-10-22 Thread Ed Schouten
* Ed Schouten , 20101022 16:30: > - Rebuild all your software (yes, I know it's unfortunate). Right after I sent this, I thought I'd better clarify this. You don't need to rebuild your software. This change will not break the existing ABI. This step is just mentioned here, since libgcc.a is static

Tested wanted: BSD-licensed libgcc replacement, libcompiler_rt

2010-10-22 Thread Ed Schouten
Hello everyone, At EuroBSDCon I was talking with some committers active in the area of Clang (brooks, kwm, others) about replacing our libgcc shipped with GCC 4.2.1 with a BSD-licensed version. The LLVM folks have a BSD licensed implementation called libcompiler_rt. See: http://compiler-r