Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: > > Here's the URL once more: > http://people.freebsd.org/~jmallett/newfs-libufs.diff Two minor issues: one use of "if Nflag" is left near the beginning of the diff and would prefer the check in bwrite() be "if !Nflag" instead of returning early. -

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] > I just went to do this, and found that pwrite is failing, saying EBADF. > Could this be because of the failed ioctl? I'm not sure why this is

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] > * De: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] > [ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] > > O

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] > On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: > > * De: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] > > [ Subjecte: Re: Test t

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: > * De: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] > [ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] > > On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: > > > Thanks to Ruslan's reminder that tune

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] > * De: Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] > [ Subjecte: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] > > [rambl

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] > [rambling, and a patch] I thought every bit of code that would possibly write out was protected by Nflag, it isn't. I'll re-instate the wtfs funct

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] > On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: > > Thanks to Ruslan's reminder that tunefs now uses libufs and tunefs is > > one of the crunched

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: > Thanks to Ruslan's reminder that tunefs now uses libufs and tunefs is > one of the crunched programs, I realised that I really needed to make > newfs(8) use libufs. To show off that it *can* help us reduce space, > a good bit in some cases. Good to see t

Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Juli Mallett
Thanks to Ruslan's reminder that tunefs now uses libufs and tunefs is one of the crunched programs, I realised that I really needed to make newfs(8) use libufs. To show off that it *can* help us reduce space, a good bit in some cases. Well, after an afternoon of work, here's the diff. Some of it