Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-19 Thread Eric Anholt
greturn JUSTRETURN > 27069 XFree86 0.019980 PSIG SIGALRM caught handler=0x80d219c mask=0x0 code=0x0 > > Anybody have a workaround for this? > > The whole system (2.53 Ghz P4) was compiled from sources late last > week... > > Between this, and the Type1 bezier font abort, th

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-09 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 14:27:45 +0300 Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SIGFPE crashes still happed even on 2-weeks old kernel, but they are > much less frequent. I'll try to go back in time to 4-weeks old kernel > to see if it helps. As a data point... I still get signal 6, even without t

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-09 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > > > Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > > > > > Maxim Sobolev writes: > > > > > > > > > > Between this, and the Type1 bezier

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Michael Reifenberger
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: ... > Question: Did the "Bezier too big" stuff start when people upgraded > their X server port, or when they upgraded their kernel? (I just > started running -current on an x86 last week) I have a sneaking > suspicion that the fp context is not being sa

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > > > Maxim Sobolev writes: > > > > > > > > Between this, and the Type1 bezier font abort, the state of 5.0 on a > > > > > desktop

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > Maxim Sobolev writes: > > > > > > Between this, and the Type1 bezier font abort, the state of 5.0 on a > > > > desktop is very sorry indeed. My old alpha running -stable is

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Maxim Sobolev writes: > > > > Between this, and the Type1 bezier font abort, the state of 5.0 on a > > > desktop is very sorry indeed. My old alpha running -stable is far > > > more stable. > > > > > > Sigh.

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Alexander Leidinger writes: > On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:56:54 -0400 (EDT) > Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'm going to downgrade sys/i386/i386/machdep.c to 1.539 now and have a > > > > look how the system behaves. > > > > > > Doesn't work, I still get signal 6. >

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Wesley Morgan
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > To fix signal 6, I think you need to rebuild your X server. > > Do you think I have to rebuild or do you know I have to rebuild? I've rebuilt several times. I'm guessing NO, since I still have the problems periodically. --

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:56:54 -0400 (EDT) Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm going to downgrade sys/i386/i386/machdep.c to 1.539 now and have a > > > look how the system behaves. > > > > Doesn't work, I still get signal 6. > > That won't fix signal 6. That will just fix the

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Alexander Leidinger writes: > On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:27:27 +0200 > Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm going to downgrade sys/i386/i386/machdep.c to 1.539 now and have a > > look how the system behaves. > > Doesn't work, I still get signal 6. That won't fix signal 6.

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:27:27 +0200 Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm going to downgrade sys/i386/i386/machdep.c to 1.539 now and have a > look how the system behaves. Doesn't work, I still get signal 6. Bye, Alexander. -- Yes, I've heard of "decaf." What's your p

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:04:27 -0400 (EDT) Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Question: Did the "Bezier too big" stuff start when people upgraded > their X server port, or when they upgraded their kernel? (I just > started running -current on an x86 last week) I have a sneaking > suspicio

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Maxim Sobolev writes: > > Between this, and the Type1 bezier font abort, the state of 5.0 on a > > desktop is very sorry indeed. My old alpha running -stable is far > > more stable. > > > > Sigh. > > Agreed. I could add that after recent kernel

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Vladimir B.
greturn JUSTRETURN > 27069 XFree86 0.019980 PSIG SIGALRM caught handler=0x80d219c mask=0x0 code=0x0 > > Anybody have a workaround for this? > > The whole system (2.53 Ghz P4) was compiled from sources late last > week... Me too :( > Between this, and the Type1 bezier font abo

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-07 Thread Maxim Sobolev
this, and the Type1 bezier font abort, the state of 5.0 on a > desktop is very sorry indeed. My old alpha running -stable is far > more stable. > > Sigh. Agreed. I could add that after recent kernel updating I'm also often observing XFree86 dying with SIGFPU. I guess that it may ha

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-07 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Wesley Morgan writes: > This sounds very similar to a problem I am seeing that does not result in > a fatal lockup, but rather several minutes of complete unresponsiveness. > It only seems to happen when Konqueror tries to autocomplete from the > location bar. > > I'm not really sure wha

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-07 Thread Wesley Morgan
x80d219c mask=0x0 code=0x0 > > Anybody have a workaround for this? > > The whole system (2.53 Ghz P4) was compiled from sources late last > week... > > Between this, and the Type1 bezier font abort, the state of 5.0 on a > desktop is very sorry indeed. My old alpha runni

sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-07 Thread Andrew Gallatin
ybody have a workaround for this? The whole system (2.53 Ghz P4) was compiled from sources late last week... Between this, and the Type1 bezier font abort, the state of 5.0 on a desktop is very sorry indeed. My old alpha running -stable is far more stable. Sigh. Drew To Unsubscribe: send ma

Sorry, false alarm (was: Panic with today's -CURRENT at runq_choose+0x83)

2002-02-20 Thread David Wolfskill
common/S3/obj/usr/src/sys/LAPTOP_30W_NC i386 g1-7(5.0-C)[2] So... move along, folks; nothing to see here Sorry for the noise. Cheers, david (links to my resume at http://www.catwhisker.org/~david) -- David H. Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe it wo

Looks like I solved my own problem... Sorry...

2001-07-30 Thread Jim Bryant
Okay, AFTER rebuilding linuxthreads with the most recent port, IT DID make it past gen_lex_hash. Word to the wise, if you haven't rebuilt linuxthreads, I suggest you do to avoid the problems I have had. Again, I am running -current of the early hours [CDT] of Sunday morning. Jim Bryant wrote:

Sorry. Off topic but need help.

2001-03-03 Thread Bob Martin
While trying to upgrade a 3.3-Stable box to 4.2-Release, we crashed during the upgrade. After restoring the system from tape, password no longer work. We've tried killing all files except master.passwd and regenerating with pwd_mkdb, but that didn't work. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Heh Heh Ooops... Sorry Stuffed sendmail.cf file ... Sorry...

2000-03-12 Thread Kerry Morse
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 13383291 Metro Tasmania Pty Ltd Phone 0419585308 - If it works, tear it apart and find out why! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

sorry. Mistyped

2000-03-09 Thread Soren Dayton
I was thinking about -current something and wrote current. Please disregard my message. Soren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Sorry....

1999-12-02 Thread Matthew Jacob
> Well, I wasn't back in town until last night with 5000 messages to catch > up on. Sorry for not getting your questions first. > > There are other things broken too. Oh well- I really shouldn't get wired. > *BSD will get taken as a serious effort as much as it d

sorry, dead drive == Re: nfs ick in -current

1999-07-07 Thread Alfred Perlstein
recently would have alleviated (sp?) the hangs I've been getting > > > > while building things in ports for the last couple of months. > > > > > > > > It used to be that just NFS would hang, now it seems to crash the > > > > entire box. ugh,

Error while make world (cvsuped 990501). Sorry!

1999-05-01 Thread REM
signal 11 *** Error code 1 Sorry! My BIOS settings was incorrect! Make world is OK! REM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message