On 27 Jan 2000 15:25:55 +0100, Eric Jacoboni wrote:
> No, not on my box (as far as i believe 'ls' and 'file' ;-) :
>
> % ls -l /usr/sbin/sendmail
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 26 jan 23:54 /usr/sbin/sendmail ->
> /usr/sbin/mailwrapper
My humble apologies. No more drugs for me. :-)
Ciao,
Shel
Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 26 Jan 2000 20:33:31 +0100, Eric Jacoboni wrote:
>
> > in CURRENT, /usr/sbin/sendmail is a symlink to /usr/sbin/mailwrapper
> > (see man mailwrapper).
>
> No, it's a hard link. I only mention this because your explanation
> makes it sound like mai
On 26 Jan 2000 20:33:31 +0100, Eric Jacoboni wrote:
> in CURRENT, /usr/sbin/sendmail is a symlink to /usr/sbin/mailwrapper
> (see man mailwrapper).
No, it's a hard link. I only mention this because your explanation
makes it sound like mailwrapper generates much more overhead than it
really do
Matt Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It hangs on the startup of sendmail. I have replaced sendmail on my
> system with Postfix. Addtionally, I have the following line in
> /etc/make.conf
>
> NO_SENDMAIL=true
That's ok : the 'make replace' of the postfix port replace
/usr/sbin/sendmai
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 11:47:04 MST, Matt Miller wrote:
> Chastisment humbly accepted.
*chastise* :-)
> The only references to sendmail that I see in the UPDATING file is
> about the move of the sendmail.cf, which doesn't seem relevant.
It's sorta relevant.
> Since starting this email, I have
Firs tof all, I apologize if I am reasking a question, since I haven't done
a good job of keeping up on my -current mail. Chastisment humbly accepted.
I did check the -current archive on www.freebsd.org and have not seen a mention of
this.
On my last two make worlds I have had trouble with my
