Terry Lambert wrote:
> > I'll take a whack at it and send it out by tomorrow, working or not.
>
> Don't bother. 8-).
>
> The attached patch makes it compile, and takes a shot at doing the
> right thing.
Just a followup... select definitely won't work (IMO), but needs
someone who is threads-sav
Nate Lawson wrote:
> > It's not so much that I volunteered as I said that I'd help with
> > thread/proc issues..
> > The trouble was that there are places where it used a proc in the old
> > code, but in some cases it needs to be a proc, and in other cases it now
> > needs to be a thread. But all t
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:10:45PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote the words in effect of:
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:10:50PM +0100, Martijn Pronk wrote the words in
>effect of:
> > > > In file inclu
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:10:50PM +0100, Martijn Pronk wrote the words in
>effect of:
> > > > In file included from /home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.c:46:
>
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:10:50PM +0100, Martijn Pronk wrote the words in effect
>of:
> > > In file included from /home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.c:46:
> > > /home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.h:174: field `nc_lock
Nate Lawson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:10:50PM +0100, Martijn Pronk wrote the words in effect of:
In file included from /home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.c:46:
/home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.h:174: field `nc_lock' has incomplete type
/home/src/sy
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:10:50PM +0100, Martijn Pronk wrote the words in effect of:
> > In file included from /home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.c:46:
> > /home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.h:174: field `nc_lock' has incomplete type
> > /home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_co
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:10:50PM +0100, Martijn Pronk wrote the words in effect of:
> Martijn Pronk wrote:
>
> >Robert Watson wrote:
> >
> >>The build of netncp is currently broken on 5.0-CURRENT, and I'd like to
> >>see this fixed before 5.0-RELEASE. Unfortunately, we're having a lot of
> >>tr
Martijn Pronk wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
The build of netncp is currently broken on 5.0-CURRENT, and I'd like to
see this fixed before 5.0-RELEASE. Unfortunately, we're having a lot of
trouble finding a test environment, which is the natural and immediate
follow-on to the compile fixes :-).
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Brad Knowles wrote:
> > > At 2:31 PM -0800 2002/11/22, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > >
> > > > A "bug-filing wizard" would be useful. The "send-pr" system
> > > > doesn't cut it, and most peo
Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Brad Knowles wrote:
> > At 2:31 PM -0800 2002/11/22, Terry Lambert wrote:
> >
> > > A "bug-filing wizard" would be useful. The "send-pr" system
> > > doesn't cut it, and most people are unaware of how to file a
> > > decent bug rep
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 2:31 PM -0800 2002/11/22, Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> > A "bug-filing wizard" would be useful. The "send-pr" system
> > doesn't cut it, and most people are unaware of how to file a
> > decent bug report. It doesn't help when the process involves
> >
Robert Watson wrote:
> It sounds like there are a couple of problems here
> -- that we need a debugging guide (How to prepare a useful bug
>report for a kernel panic, How to prepare a useful bug report
>for a sysinstall failure, etc)
A "bug-filing wizard" would be useful. The "send-pr" sy
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Martijn Pronk wrote:
> >The build of netncp is currently broken on 5.0-CURRENT, and I'd like to
> >see this fixed before 5.0-RELEASE. Unfortunately, we're having a lot of
> >trouble finding a test environment, which is the natural and immediate
> >follow-on to the compile fix
Robert Watson wrote:
The build of netncp is currently broken on 5.0-CURRENT, and I'd like to
see this fixed before 5.0-RELEASE. Unfortunately, we're having a lot of
trouble finding a test environment, which is the natural and immediate
follow-on to the compile fixes :-). Was wondering if anyone
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Brad Knowles wrote:
> > If I might suggest: there's a freebsd-qa mailing list. It's a great place
> > to organize QA efforts, whereas freebsd-chat is notorious for its lack of
> > signal (it's where dead signals go to rot).
>
> There's been some talk of freebsd-qa,
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 5:23 PM -0500 2002/11/21, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> > (And, you have to bring your own test environment, as the second sentence
> > suggests, but doesn't actually state).
>
> Over on -chat, we're in the process of putting together a list
> of
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Robert Watson wrote:
> The build of netncp is currently broken on 5.0-CURRENT, and I'd like to
> see this fixed before 5.0-RELEASE. Unfortunately, we're having a lot of
> trouble finding a test environment, which is the natural and immediate
> follow-on to the compile fixes
The build of netncp is currently broken on 5.0-CURRENT, and I'd like to
see this fixed before 5.0-RELEASE. Unfortunately, we're having a lot of
trouble finding a test environment, which is the natural and immediate
follow-on to the compile fixes :-). Was wondering if anyone with FreeBSD
kernel d
19 matches
Mail list logo
