[This thread started on -hackers, went private and now pops up in
-emulation through -current. You may want to look in -hackers to see the
original posting by Doug White]
Doug White wrote:
>
> I'm bringing this back up to -current to kick around some more. We may
> want to move it to -emulators
I'm bringing this back up to -current to kick around some more. We may
want to move it to -emulators.
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > This isn't intended as a 'final solution' :-) The problem is *very*
> > difficult since you're asking the syscall to intuit what the user/progra
Doug White wrote:
>
> Please let me know if you have comments/suggestions/etc. If no one whines
> too badly I'll commit these later this week and finally break my
> declaration against making kernel changes. :)
I'm not sure I like this. Please hold off until I've got some time to
think this ove
On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Doug White wrote:
> Hello fellow hackers,
>
> I've written up a short patch to add a sysctl to control the appending of
> /compat/linux/ to path requests in Linux mode. We had to get ADSM's Linux
> client working on FreeBSD so we could do backups of our systems. Luckily
>
On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Doug White wrote:
> Hello fellow hackers,
>
> I've written up a short patch to add a sysctl to control the appending of
> /compat/linux/ to path requests in Linux mode. We had to get ADSM's Linux
> client working on FreeBSD so we could do backups of our systems. Luckily
Hello fellow hackers,
I've written up a short patch to add a sysctl to control the appending of
/compat/linux/ to path requests in Linux mode. We had to get ADSM's Linux
client working on FreeBSD so we could do backups of our systems. Luckily
it comes statically linked so all was needed was thi
