Re: SCHED_ULE and priorities

2003-02-04 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:54:23PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:38:18PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > I just booted a kernel with SCHED_ULE. It looks like there's a pretty > > > serious bug: > > > > > > PID USERNAME PRI

Re: SCHED_ULE and priorities

2003-02-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:54:23PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:38:18PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > I just booted a kernel with SCHED_ULE. It looks like there's a pretty > > serious bug: > > > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAN

Re: SCHED_ULE and priorities

2003-02-04 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:38:18PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I just booted a kernel with SCHED_ULE. It looks like there's a pretty > serious bug: > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND > 573 dnetc139 20 1000K 804K RUN 1:29 85.94% 85.94% d

Re: SCHED_ULE and priorities

2003-02-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:38:18PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I just booted a kernel with SCHED_ULE. It looks like there's a pretty > serious bug: > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND > 573 dnetc139 20 1000K 804K RUN 1:29 85.94% 85.94% d

SCHED_ULE and priorities

2003-02-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
I just booted a kernel with SCHED_ULE. It looks like there's a pretty serious bug: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 573 dnetc139 20 1000K 804K RUN 1:29 85.94% 85.94% dnetc 661 kris 960 2252K 1496K RUN 0:00 6.25% 6.25% to