Re: ucontext

2000-03-22 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > However, I can think of two situations under which it might have to > be a system call: I'm fairly certain I found a circumstance which required that it be available to a system call, but I can't remember quite what it was. (It was some other system call which could accept a ucontext_t

Re: ucontext

2000-03-22 Thread Arun Sharma
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 02:48:24PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Arun Sharma wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 08:04:37AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > > > I had them implemented and working for i386, and even had a hacked up > > > libc_r that used them instead of

Re: ucontext

2000-03-22 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Arun Sharma wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 08:04:37AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > I had them implemented and working for i386, and even had a hacked up > > libc_r that used them instead of setjmp/longjmp. This was a few months > > ago under 4.0-current. At the t

Re: ucontext

2000-03-22 Thread Arun Sharma
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 08:04:37AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > I had them implemented and working for i386, and even had a hacked up > libc_r that used them instead of setjmp/longjmp. This was a few months > ago under 4.0-current. At the time, I thought they'd be better off > implemented a

Re: ucontext

2000-03-22 Thread Mark Newton
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 10:54:32PM -0800, Arun Sharma wrote: > > > Before getting too far here, can we consider some other > > > standard interfaces? > > > #include > > > int getcontext(ucontext_t *ucp); > > > int setcontext(const ucontext_t *ucp); > > > void makecontex

Re: ucontext

2000-03-22 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Arun Sharma wrote: > On Tue, Sep 07, 1999 at 01:21:59PM +0200, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > Peter Wemm wrote: > > > > > > Before getting too far here, can we consider some other standard interfaces? > > > > > > #include > > > > > > int getcontext(ucontext_t *ucp);