On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 23:39, Alex Wilkinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:02:03AM +, Doug Rabson wrote:
>
> I wasn't involved in converting taskqueue from 4.x-style SWIs to kernel
> threads so I can't be sure but this does look reasonable. I've been
> wondering ab
* Alex Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031110 15:44] wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:02:03AM +, Doug Rabson wrote:
>
> I wasn't involved in converting taskqueue from 4.x-style SWIs to kernel
> threads so I can't be sure but this does look reasonable. I've been
> wond
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:02:03AM +, Doug Rabson wrote:
I wasn't involved in converting taskqueue from 4.x-style SWIs to kernel
threads so I can't be sure but this does look reasonable. I've been
wondering about the 'not exiting' diagnostic from init for a whil
I wasn't involved in converting taskqueue from 4.x-style SWIs to kernel
threads so I can't be sure but this does look reasonable. I've been
wondering about the 'not exiting' diagnostic from init for a while
myself.
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 05:10, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> I noticed that init was comp
