In message <201708210241.v7l2ftcf073...@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net>,
Jamie La
ndeg-Jones writes:
> > 3. should total swap be 1x 2x or some other multiple of RAM these days?
>
> According to tuning(7) :
>
> | SYSTEM SETUP - DISKLABEL, NEWFS, TUNEFS, SWAP
> | The swap partition should typicall
> 3. should total swap be 1x 2x or some other multiple of RAM these days?
According to tuning(7) :
| SYSTEM SETUP - DISKLABEL, NEWFS, TUNEFS, SWAP
| The swap partition should typically be approximately 2x the size of
| main memory for systems with less than 4GB of RAM, or approximately
| eq
Am 20.08.17 um 01:39 schrieb Greg 'groggy' Lehey:
>> 3. should total swap be 1x 2x or some other multiple of RAM these days?
>
> It never needed to be. The only issue is that if you want processor
> dumps, you once needed a swap partition (and not a swap file) at least
> marginally larger than me
On Saturday, August 19, 2017 06:08:29 PM tech-lists wrote:
> On 19/08/2017 17:54, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > Then it doesn't matter if you use one or many swapfiles and deleting the 4
> > GB won't make a difference. Just add the desired swap as required.
> >
> > With 128 GB RAM you shouldn't be swapp
On 20/08/2017 08:22, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> Depends. I have vm.pageout_update_period=0 in /etc/sysctl.conf
> and scan rate (sr) really does reflect the true scan rate. On
> my system sr is 0 while the system is idle.
>
> As an aside, my system (8GB RAM) hardly ever swaps, even under
> heavy mem
On 19/08/2017 22:00, Cy Schubert wrote:
> An easy way to find out is to run top, type in "w", then "o" and "swap" to
> see which processes are using swap. You'll notice that the numbers won't
> add up. I haven't looked at this but my guess is that there may be swap
> leak. You can verify this by
On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 15:38:15 -0700
Cy Schubert wrote:
> In message <20170819213149.GA34140@raichu>, Mark Johnston writes:
> > On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 02:24:19PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > > In message <201708192100.v7jl0vfk003...@slippy.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert
> > > writes:
> > >
> > >
On Saturday, 19 August 2017 at 16:00:28 +0100, tech-lists wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> (freebsd-current is r317212 on this machine)
>
> I have a machine with 128GB RAM. When 12-current was installed, for some
> reason the swap partition was set to 4GB. I see sometimes via top and
> also via daily statu
In message <20170819213149.GA34140@raichu>, Mark Johnston writes:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 02:24:19PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > In message <201708192100.v7jl0vfk003...@slippy.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert
> > writes:
> >
> > > (On my -CURRENT laptop I see a scan rate in the hundreds on a totally
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 02:24:19PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
> In message <201708192100.v7jl0vfk003...@slippy.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert
> writes:
>
> > (On my -CURRENT laptop I see a scan rate in the hundreds on a totally idle
> > laptop and in the teens of my idle firewall. IMO this doesn't seem
In message <201708192100.v7jl0vfk003...@slippy.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert
writes:
> (On my -CURRENT laptop I see a scan rate in the hundreds on a totally idle
> laptop and in the teens of my idle firewall. IMO this doesn't seem right,
> at least not compared to previous releases of FreeBSD or fro
In message , tech-lists
writes:
> On 19/08/2017 17:54, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > Then it doesn't matter if you use one or many swapfiles and deleting the 4
> > GB won't make a difference. Just add the desired swap as required.
> >
> > With 128 GB RAM you shouldn't be swapping anyway. If your system
In message , David
Chisnall w
rites:
> On 19 Aug 2017, at 17:54, Cy Schubert wrote:
> >
> >> 3. should total swap be 1x 2x or some other multiple of RAM these days?
> >
> > Depends. If you're running some kind of database server or OLTP
> > application. Some vendors recommend no swap whatsoeve
On 19 Aug 2017, at 17:54, Cy Schubert wrote:
>
>> 3. should total swap be 1x 2x or some other multiple of RAM these days?
>
> Depends. If you're running some kind of database server or OLTP
> application. Some vendors recommend no swap whatsoever while others
> recommend some. What does your a
On 19/08/2017 17:54, Cy Schubert wrote:
> Then it doesn't matter if you use one or many swapfiles and deleting the 4
> GB won't make a difference. Just add the desired swap as required.
>
> With 128 GB RAM you shouldn't be swapping anyway. If your system is you
> have more serious problems than
In message <77fdd002-2873-eb67-c851-0127ae314...@zyxst.net>, tech-lists
writes:
> Hello list,
>
> (freebsd-current is r317212 on this machine)
>
> I have a machine with 128GB RAM. When 12-current was installed, for some
> reason the swap partition was set to 4GB. I see sometimes via top and
> al
16 matches
Mail list logo
