Re: src/sys/dev/syscons/scvesactl.c broken

2000-10-09 Thread Doug Barton
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Barton writes: > >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> > >> Are you sure your tree is entirely in sync ? > > > > Yes... I've checked it several times. > > > >> I can't reproduce your problem here with the NOTES/LINT kernel... > > O

Re: src/sys/dev/syscons/scvesactl.c broken

2000-10-09 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Barton writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> Are you sure your tree is entirely in sync ? > > Yes... I've checked it several times. > >> I can't reproduce your problem here with the NOTES/LINT kernel... OK, found it, two negative options in NOTES/LI

Re: src/sys/dev/syscons/scvesactl.c broken

2000-10-08 Thread Doug Barton
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > Are you sure your tree is entirely in sync ? Yes... I've checked it several times. > I can't reproduce your problem here with the NOTES/LINT kernel... The following patch got my kernel compiled and running, although I can't say it's the right thin

Re: src/sys/dev/syscons/scvesactl.c broken

2000-10-08 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Are you sure your tree is entirely in sync ? I can't reproduce your problem here with the NOTES/LINT kernel... > Version 1.16 of src/sys/dev/syscons/scvesactl.c, removing > broke the kernel build for me. Attached is the >relevant log, and my kernel file. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNI