Re: signal changes

2002-09-30 Thread Julian Elischer
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Juli Mallett wrote: > > Teh same that provides specification for queued signals - posix rts. hey that's MY typo... get your own! :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: signal changes

2002-09-30 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-09-30 ] [ Subjecte: Re: signal changes ] > > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Juli Mallett wrote: > > > * De: Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-09-30 ] > > [ Subjecte: Re: signal change

Re: signal changes

2002-09-30 Thread Julian Elischer
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Juli Mallett wrote: > * De: Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-09-30 ] > [ Subjecte: Re: signal changes ] > > > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Juli Mallett wrote: > > > > > > What limits are the on the number of si

Re: Signal changes and {,sig}{set,long}jmp

1999-09-07 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
Peter Wemm wrote: > > Before getting too far here, can we consider some other standard interfaces? > > #include > > int getcontext(ucontext_t *ucp); > int setcontext(const ucontext_t *ucp); > void makecontext(ucontext_t *ucp, (void *func)(), int argc, ...); > int swapc

Re: Signal changes and {,sig}{set,long}jmp

1999-09-07 Thread Peter Wemm
Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > Garrett Wollman wrote: > > > > < said : > > > > > The setjump/longjump family of functions are userland function > > > AFAICT. > > > > POSIX doesn't make any such distinction. Remember that setjmp/longjmp > > *already* enter the kernel, in order to save/restore th

Re: Signal changes and {,sig}{set,long}jmp

1999-09-06 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
Garrett Wollman wrote: > > < said: > > > The setjump/longjump family of functions are userland function > > AFAICT. > > POSIX doesn't make any such distinction. Remember that setjmp/longjmp > *already* enter the kernel, in order to save/restore the signal mask, > so there isn't any real perfor