Re: rtld-elf, java + tya

2000-01-24 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Max Khon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seems that this patch fixed the problem for me. > I can not reproduce it anymore. That's good news. Thanks for testing it! I'll commit it later today. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscri

Re: rtld-elf, java + tya

2000-01-23 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, John Polstra wrote: > > ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55 > > If any of you can reproduce this problem fairly reliably, please try > the appended patch for "src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c" and let me > know if it solves the prob

Re: rtld-elf, java + tya

2000-01-23 Thread John Polstra
> ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55 If any of you can reproduce this problem fairly reliably, please try the appended patch for "src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c" and let me know if it solves the problem. Thanks, John Index: lockdflt.c ==

Re: rtld-elf, java + tya

2000-01-23 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Max Khon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > applet_viewer bombs out with a lot of stuff in the output like this > (until killed -9): > > ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55 The last time this problem happened (I thought I fixed it!),

Re: rtld-elf, java + tya

2000-01-21 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, John Polstra wrote: > Really?! Augh. Naturally this comes just hours after I have merged > the latest changes into -stable *sigh*. > > Could you please make sure your src/libexec/rtld-elf is > up-to-date? rtld.c should be at revision 1.41. yes. my src/libexec

Re: rtld-elf, java + tya

2000-01-21 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Amancio Hasty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am fairly certain that Java + TYA worked before Jan 7 -- haven't > upgraded my system since then. Yes, that assert that failed wasn't in the dynamic linker on January 7. What I need to know is: did it start failing soo

Re: rtld-elf, java + tya

2000-01-21 Thread Russell L. Carter
|From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 21 11:23:14 2000 | |In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, |Russell L. Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |> I've seen it with yesterdays current and libc_r threads, and it's intermittent. | |Did this problem just start, or has it been there for awhile? I |haven't changed

Re: rtld-elf, java + tya

2000-01-21 Thread Amancio Hasty
I am fairly certain that Java + TYA worked before Jan 7 -- haven't upgraded my system since then. -- Amancio Hasty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: rtld-elf, java + tya

2000-01-21 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Russell L. Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've seen it with yesterdays current and libc_r threads, and it's intermittent. Did this problem just start, or has it been there for awhile? I haven't changed the dynamic linker in -current since January 9, and I'm w

Re: rtld-elf, java + tya

2000-01-21 Thread Russell L. Carter
I've seen it with yesterdays current and libc_r threads, and it's intermittent. Russell To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: rtld-elf, java + tya

2000-01-21 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Max Khon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, there! > > applet_viewer bombs out with a lot of stuff in the output like this > (until killed -9): > > ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55 Really?! Augh. Naturally this comes just hours

Re: rtld-elf, java + tya

2000-01-21 Thread Pascal Hofstee
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 06:42:51PM +0600, Max Khon wrote: > hi, there! > > applet_viewer bombs out with a lot of stuff in the output like this > (until killed -9): > > ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55 > ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lock