Re: reply to field

1999-01-02 Thread Oscar Bonilla
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 06:54:32PM -0600, Chris Costello wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > Curious, why is the reply field in the email header not set > > to the originating mailing list? Just thought that it will make > > it easier to reply to postings to the mailing lists s

Re: reply to field

1999-01-02 Thread Amancio Hasty
> Thus spake Amancio Hasty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > it easier to reply to postings to the mailing lists so people don't > > get multiple copies of the same message. I don't have such > > problem because I have a mail filter which delete duplicate > > messages. > > Reply-To: also destroys priva

Re: reply to field

1999-01-02 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake Amancio Hasty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > it easier to reply to postings to the mailing lists so people don't > get multiple copies of the same message. I don't have such > problem because I have a mail filter which delete duplicate > messages. Reply-To: also destroys private Reply-To:'s.

Re: reply to field

1999-01-02 Thread Chris Costello
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote: > Curious, why is the reply field in the email header not set > to the originating mailing list? Just thought that it will make > it easier to reply to postings to the mailing lists so people don't > get multiple copies of the same message. I don't have s