On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 03:48:03PM +0600, Boris Popov wrote:
> You need options LIBMCHAIN as well. We don't have mechanism for
> specifying dependancies between options as of yet. (sorry, should put a
> note in the NOTES).
OOps, okay. Thanks :)
OTOH, it seems that suspending a program (hi
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > You need options LIBMCHAIN as well. We don't have mechanism for
> > specifying dependancies between options as of yet. (sorry, should put a
> > note in the NOTES).
>
> Actually, yes we do, although it's not often used. If the relevant
> source
< said:
> You need options LIBMCHAIN as well. We don't have mechanism for
> specifying dependancies between options as of yet. (sorry, should put a
> note in the NOTES).
Actually, yes we do, although it's not often used. If the relevant
sources are listed twice in `files', conditional on
Alex Zepeda wrote:
>
> I haven't been able to track this down since the kernel won't panic.. but
> with more recent kernels I've noticed:
>
> * options NCP prevents the kernel from linking
> * midi panics the system right after bootup
>
Saw the NCP problem today at ctm-cvs-cur 7214.
Saw the mi
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> I haven't been able to track this down since the kernel won't panic.. but
> with more recent kernels I've noticed:
>
> * options NCP prevents the kernel from linking
You need options LIBMCHAIN as well. We don't have mechanism for
specifying dep
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 12:49:01AM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> The kernel that seems to work was built on Feb 18th, and the ones that
> aren't are from as recently as March 13th.
D'oh. Forgot the kernel config file and dmesg output.
The config file hasn't changed, but the dmesg output is (obvi
