On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> I have an asr based RAID controller (Adaptec 2400A), though it is an IDE
> RAID controller, it uses the "SCSI" asr driver. My controller has
> worked very well with FreeBSD 5.x, and the server is currently running
> 5.1-BETA. The only thing that does
< said:
> FreeBSD 5.x series is slowly progressing, but is nowhere near to
> production quality. As the things are currently, you simply waste
> your time.
I'm running an old 5.1-current and a more recent 5.1-beta of about a
week ago in production as news servers and am reasonably pleased with
th
at
> > aac_command_thread+0x179
> > fork_exit(c31f16c0,c2679000,d1d39d48) at fork_exit+0xc0
> > fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x1a
> > --- trap 0x1, eip = 0, esp = 0xd1d39d7c, ebp = 0 ---
> > db>
> >
> > Before that I got some message on GEOM not being prop
ff buffer
before I could catch it.
Pete
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Long" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Petri Helenius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Tim Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 11:20 P
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 03:31:49PM +0300, Petri Helenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > FreeBSD 5.x series is slowly progressing, but is nowhere near to
> > production quality. As the things are currently, you simply waste
> > your time.
> > This is only my opinion and I don't want to offend anyon
>
> FreeBSD 5.x series is slowly progressing, but is nowhere near to
> production quality. As the things are currently, you simply waste
> your time.
> This is only my opinion and I don't want to offend anyone.
IMO, software does not magically get better but it must be actively
being used and pr
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 11:36:18AM +0300, Petri Helenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > left behind. I am remis in not fixing it, but please understand
> > that I also have quite a few other responsibilities, and I get
> > paid $0 to work on RAIDframe.
> >
> Not being a native english speaker I p
On 2003.06.02 11:18:34 +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
> So far I´ve tried asr and aac, both cards end up in kernel panics and/or array
> hang in a few minutes (multiple hardware platforms so I don´t think the motherboard
> is to blame)
I have an asr based RAID controller (Adaptec 2400A), though it i
>
> If you rewind to last October, RAIDFrame worked well. Unfortunately,
> some kernel interfaces changed in between now and then and RAIDFrame was
> left behind. I am remis in not fixing it, but please understand that I
> also have quite a few other responsibilities, and I get paid $0 to work
>
te
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Long" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Petri Helenius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Tim Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: raidframe
> Pet
Petri Helenius wrote:
RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current [kern/50541] and it would be
unwise to use it in 5.0 for anything other than experimentation. Hopefully it
will be fixed before 5.2.
Makes one wonder how broken code ever got into the tree in the first place...
Pete
Just settle
> RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current [kern/50541] and it would be
> unwise to use it in 5.0 for anything other than experimentation. Hopefully it
> will be fixed before 5.2.
>
Makes one wonder how broken code ever got into the tree in the first place...
Pete
I am successfully using a Mylex DAC1164PVX RAID controller on 5-CURRENT:
mlx0: port 0x2000-0x207f mem
0xf800-0xfbff,0xec91-0xec91007f irq 5 at device 8.0 on pci2
mlx0: controller initialisation in progress...
mlx0: initialisation complete.
mlx0: DAC1164PVX, 3 channels, firmware 5.08-
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 02:51:07PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
> Is there anyone actually successfully using raidframe and if yes, what kind
> of hardware?
RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current [kern/50541] and it would be
unwise to use it in 5.0 for anything other than experimentation
I'm using a Ami MegaRaid 1500 in 5.x without any issues.
-m
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Petri Helenius wrote:
>
> Is there anyone actually successfully using raidframe and if yes, what kind
> of hardware?
>
> Same question goes for any recent SCSI RAID controllers supported
> by FreeBSD.
>
> I admit no
15 matches
Mail list logo
