On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 04:13:00PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 03:48:13PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Setting up on NanoBSD vi pw command an initial /etc/pw.conf (usermod -D), I
> > use
> > amongst other options also:
> >
> > -u 2000,32767 -i 2000,32767
> >
> > w
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 03:48:13PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Setting up on NanoBSD vi pw command an initial /etc/pw.conf (usermod -D), I
> use
> amongst other options also:
>
> -u 2000,32767 -i 2000,32767
>
> which finally and successfully expands to
>
> [...]
> # Range of valid default user
ah. my apologies. rebuilt the new libutil again and it seems that r248012 does
indeed resolve the problem. :)
--- On Sat, 3/9/13, KT Sin wrote:
From: KT Sin
Subject: Re: pw is broken?
To: "hiren panchasara" , d...@freebsd.org
Cc: "freebsd-current"
Date: Saturday, March 9,
ah, this is a different problem. one quick workaround is to comment out the
unused variable ic :P, or you could include INVARIANTS in your kernel config,
or you could ping adrian :)
--- On Sat, 3/9/13, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>
> But neither r248102 nor r248103 compile!
>
> /usr/src/sys/net80211
On 09.03.13 15:52, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> Am 03/09/13 15:34, schrieb hiren panchasara:
>> On Mar 8, 2013 9:44 PM, "KT Sin" wrote:
>>>
>>> pw is crashing with seg fault due to this change?
>>>
>>>
>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libutil/gr_util.c?r1=245390&r2=247919
>>
>> I think the corr
saw the commit an hour ago. rebuilt libutil.so.9 and unfortunately it still
crashes for me :(
--- On Sat, 3/9/13, hiren panchasara wrote:
From: hiren panchasara
Subject: Re: pw is broken?
To: kt...@acm.org
Cc: "freebsd-current"
Date: Saturday, March 9, 2013, 10:34 PM
On Mar 8,
Am 03/09/13 15:34, schrieb hiren panchasara:
> On Mar 8, 2013 9:44 PM, "KT Sin" wrote:
>>
>> pw is crashing with seg fault due to this change?
>>
>>
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libutil/gr_util.c?r1=245390&r2=247919
>
> I think the correct fix is committed with:
> http://svnweb.freeb
On Mar 8, 2013 9:44 PM, "KT Sin" wrote:
>
> pw is crashing with seg fault due to this change?
>
>
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libutil/gr_util.c?r1=245390&r2=247919
I think the correct fix is committed with:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248102
Hiren
>
> # gdb ./pw
> GNU gd
On 11/17/12 07:24, Ryan Stone wrote:
> /etc/group is supposed to be world-reable, right? Tools like groups or pw
> groupshow certainly seem to think so:
>
> [rstone@rstone-server ~]groups
> 1001 920
> [rstone@rstone-server ~]ls -l /etc/group
> -rw--- 1 root 0 482 Nov 14 21:02 /etc/group
> [
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:45:43PM +0200, Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
> On 2012-11-19, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > First, pw should not fail if other instance is running, it should wait
> > instead (think of parallel batch scripts adding some users/groups).
> >
> > Second, current code has a race:
> > loc
On 2012-11-19, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> First, pw should not fail if other instance is running, it should wait
> instead (think of parallel batch scripts adding some users/groups).
>
> Second, current code has a race:
> lockfd = open(group_file, O_RDONLY, 0);
> if (lockfd < 0 || fcntl(lockfd, F_SETF
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:37:45PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:28:43PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:20:21AM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
> > > My original complaint that /etc/group gets permissions of 0600 is a result
> > > of a bug in lib
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:28:43PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:20:21AM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
> > My original complaint that /etc/group gets permissions of 0600 is a result
> > of a bug in libutil, which bapt@ ported pw to use in r242349. The new
> > group manipulati
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:20:21AM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
> My original complaint that /etc/group gets permissions of 0600 is a result
> of a bug in libutil, which bapt@ ported pw to use in r242349. The new
> group manipulation API using mktemp to create a temporary file, writes the
> new group
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:20:21AM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
> Wow. So apparently things are even more broken than I though. Let's play,
> "What group am I in?"
>
> root@group-testing:/usr/home/rstone # cd /tmp
> root@group-testing:/tmp # pw groupadd testing
> root@group-testing:/tmp # mkdir test
Wow. So apparently things are even more broken than I though. Let's play,
"What group am I in?"
root@group-testing:/usr/home/rstone # cd /tmp
root@group-testing:/tmp # pw groupadd testing
root@group-testing:/tmp # mkdir testdir
root@group-testing:/tmp # chown root:testing testdir/
root@group-tes
At 2:25 AM +0600 1/24/03, Max Khon wrote:
hi, there!
Can we enable using '$' in usernames in pw?
The patch is attached.
Other variant is to enable using '$' only at end of user name.
I'd prefer to go with "only at the end of a user name", and I did
have a patch which does that. Now I just hav
Attached is Terry's patch modified to include $ in group names as well. I have
tested it. Both adduser(8) and rmuser(8) work as expected. Please give -audit a
chance to object and then commit it. Also, please close PR: bin/46890 when you
do.
We should have had this a long time ago. If -audit does
Max Khon wrote:
> most messages were related to adduser.pl. adduser.pl has gone
> and adduser.sh now uses pw directly
>
> as for login class and group names -- there is nothing wrong with '$'
> in them but if anyone would be uncomfortable with it why not commit
> the patch that someone (Terry?) su
hi, there!
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:54:18PM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> > Can we enable using '$' in usernames in pw?
> > The patch is attached.
>
> The same patch was submitted here by David Chapman:
>
>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1059329+1062195+/usr/local/www/db/text/20
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 02:25:38AM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
> hi, there!
>
> Can we enable using '$' in usernames in pw?
> The patch is attached.
The same patch was submitted here by David Chapman:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1059329+1062195+/usr/local/www/db/text/2002/freebsd-curre
"David W. Chapman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I run the command in the topic I get the following error.
>
> pw: group update: Inappropriate ioctl for device
>
> This works in -stable
>
> I noticed this problem while testing postfix-current which runs
>
> /usr/sbin/pw groupadd ${grou
22 matches
Mail list logo
