On 2023-08-15 13:28:07, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
The old -d and the new -D'$^' would be the best in that -d would go back
to what it was and -D would provide the much needed feature in two
variants (possibly more in the future, if needed) while only taking one
option-letter. The only problem is
"Piotr P. Stefaniak" wrote:
> On 2023-08-11 12:32:02, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
> >How about reverting '-d', and adding "-D" for descending, and "-A" for
> >ascending?
>
> I don't like that, because it would take three option-letters in total
> to implement the same function in different variant
On 2023-08-11 12:32:02, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
How about reverting '-d', and adding "-D" for descending, and "-A" for
ascending?
I don't like that, because it would take three option-letters in total
to implement the same function in different variants.
The old -d and the new -D'$^' would
"Piotr P. Stefaniak" wrote:
> I thought about this more and the change I proposed in
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D41231 seems unnecessarily complicated,
> regardless of which characters will be chosen to denote going up and
> down the process tree. ps -D'^$' suggests there are possibly more
> c
I thought about this more and the change I proposed in
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D41231 seems unnecessarily complicated,
regardless of which characters will be chosen to denote going up and
down the process tree. ps -D'^$' suggests there are possibly more
characters to use and maybe even some ki
On 2023-07-29 00:07:37, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
I have a program that produces a list of PIDS, that are supplied via '-p'
to /bin/ps and are sorted with '-d'.
What language is it written in? What is the use case?
After a late upgrade on a particular machine, I've just been bitten
by the mod
