Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Will Andrews wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:10:14PM +, Paul Richards wrote:
> > > The problem is that 'make install' in a port doesn't check dependencies
> > > properly, whereas pkg_install does.
> > Uh, actually, 'make install' does a better
Will Andrews wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:10:14PM +, Paul Richards wrote:
> > The problem is that 'make install' in a port doesn't check dependencies
> > properly, whereas pkg_install does.
>
> Uh, actually, 'make install' does a better job. pkg_install has no
> clue about substitu
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:10:14PM +, Paul Richards wrote:
> > Leif Neland wrote:
> > The problem is that 'make install' in a port doesn't check dependencies
> > properly, whereas pkg_install does.
>
> Is this really true? There are even bsd.port.mk targets you can
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:10:14PM +, Paul Richards wrote:
> Leif Neland wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 08:23:35PM -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 01:56:11AM +0100, Leif Neland scribbled:
> > > > | It seems pkg_update is only usable when installing from
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:10:14PM +, Paul Richards wrote:
> The problem is that 'make install' in a port doesn't check dependencies
> properly, whereas pkg_install does.
Uh, actually, 'make install' does a better job. pkg_install has no
clue about substitute dependencies.
--
wca
To Unsu
Leif Neland wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 08:23:35PM -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 01:56:11AM +0100, Leif Neland scribbled:
> > > | It seems pkg_update is only usable when installing from packages, not from
> > > | ports.
> > >
> > > Because it is a package upd
[moved to -ports]
If memory serves me right, "Leif Neland" wrote:
> Couldn't it be made possible to use just the update-of-dependencies part of p
> kg_update without doing the pkg_delete/pkg_install bit?
>
> Perhaps I'll try...
Manipulating the bits is relatively straightforward. Doing so in
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 08:23:35PM -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 01:56:11AM +0100, Leif Neland scribbled:
> > | It seems pkg_update is only usable when installing from packages, not from
> > | ports.
> >
> > Because it is a package update system. If you want to upda
If memory serves me right, Nik Clayton wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 08:23:35PM -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 01:56:11AM +0100, Leif Neland scribbled:
> > | It seems pkg_update is only usable when installing from packages, not fro
> m
> > | ports.
> >
> > Because it
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 08:23:35PM -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 01:56:11AM +0100, Leif Neland scribbled:
> | It seems pkg_update is only usable when installing from packages, not from
> | ports.
>
> Because it is a package update system. If you want to update
> from the
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 01:56:11AM +0100, Leif Neland scribbled:
> | It seems pkg_update is only usable when installing from packages, not from
> | ports.
>
> Because it is a package update system. If you want to update
> from the ports, use 'pkg_ve
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 01:56:11AM +0100, Leif Neland scribbled:
| It seems pkg_update is only usable when installing from packages, not from
| ports.
Because it is a package update system. If you want to update
from the ports, use 'pkg_version -c |sh'
| Even when I first do a make package, and
12 matches
Mail list logo
