On 18 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Try the attached patch. You'll need to rebuild libutil and restart
> sshd.
Works.
Thanks.
--
| Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL| ix86,sparc,pmax |
| http
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yep, the problem seems to be that sshd calls pam_open_session(3) too
> early. I'm looking into it right now.
Try the attached patch. You'll need to rebuild libutil and restart
sshd.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- //depot
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Matthew N. Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If not pam_unix, what module is responsible for updating utmp?
> pam_lastlog(8) (though there seems to be a problem with sshd)
Yep, the problem seems to be that sshd calls pam_open_session(3) too
e
"Matthew N. Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If not pam_unix, what module is responsible for updating utmp?
pam_lastlog(8) (though there seems to be a problem with sshd)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-c
On 18 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Actually, the bug is in the PAM configuration files that list pam_unix
> as a "session" module while pam_unix doesn't provide session
> management services. PAM is correct in whining about that. The
> solution is to remove lines like this from /etc/pa
Bill Fenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Part of the commit log for rev 1.32 of pam_unix.c says:
>
> - remove dummy functions since OpenPAM handles missing service
> functions
>
> However, OpenPAM is noisy about handling missing service functions:
>
> Apr 17 11:21:31 stash login: in open
