Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-05 Thread Mark Murray
> According to Mark Murray: > > Can you make it so that if NO_OPENSSL is not defined, then openssl is used? > > I could of course but I don't think that having PUBKEYS by defaults (X.509 > based, not the PGP ones) is probably not very useful yet as it is a fairly > recent option. > > AUTOKEY sho

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-05 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Sat, 04 Aug 2001 17:20:05 -0400, Mixtim wrote: > > Ha, you think that's bad. Mills doesn't want to be bothered to change his > > ways to use any sort of revision control. That's how set in his ways he > > is. Almost as bad as Linus. > > :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/ntp > > You can che

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 12:25:13PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote: > Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very > soon. > > The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code > builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now,

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-04 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Mark Murray: > Can you make it so that if NO_OPENSSL is not defined, then openssl is used? I could of course but I don't think that having PUBKEYS by defaults (X.509 based, not the PGP ones) is probably not very useful yet as it is a fairly recent option. AUTOKEY should be enough. A

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-04 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Gordon Tetlow: > >From what I gather (and the cvs repo seems to back up) is that Mills has > never actually committed a thing. Harlan Stenn does most of the CVS work. That's correct. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-04 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Mixtim wrote: > On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:03:10PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > Ha, you think that's bad. Mills doesn't want to be bothered to change his > > ways to use any sort of revision control. That's how set in his ways he > > is. Almost as bad as Linus. > > :pserv

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-04 Thread Mixtim
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:03:10PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > Ha, you think that's bad. Mills doesn't want to be bothered to change his > ways to use any sort of revision control. That's how set in his ways he > is. Almost as bad as Linus. :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/ntp You can checkou

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-04 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > On Fri, 03 Aug 2001 10:18:49 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > So let me guess. Not only does Mills think that the web is the only > sensible distribution medium for documentation, he also thinks that > English is the only sensible language for it? Ha, y

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-03 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Fri, 03 Aug 2001 08:52:19 +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote: > > Unless David Mills can be convinced to manage his documentation in a > > sensible fashion, this will be the last upgrade for which I'll be doing > > HTML -> mdoc transcription. > > Don't hold your breath then, he repeated two days

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-03 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Garrett Wollman: > I'd like to have the AUTOKEY functionality available if at all > possible. Goodnews: the first run I've done of configure with --with-crypto=autokey give me no dependencies on openssl (which is necessary for public key stuff). -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- Eurocontrol

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-03 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Ollivier Robert wrote: > > > Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very > > soon. > > > > The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code > > builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-03 Thread Mark Murray
> Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very > soon. :-) :-) :-) > The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code > builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1, > it can be linked to openssl but it is sti

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-03 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Maxim Sobolev: > libmd I meant. That's a possibility but it already has its own md5/des code. It is just that authentication through openssl is available and many 5.x / 4.x have it by default... It is required by sshd and friends but crypto is still optional. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-03 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Ollivier Robert wrote: > Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very > soon. > > The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code > builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1, > it can be linked to openssl b

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-03 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Thu, 02 Aug 2001 14:07:38 +0100, Mark Murray wrote: > > Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very > > soon. > > :-) :-) :-) Unless David Mills can be convinced to manage his documentation in a sensible fashion, this will be the last upgrade for which I'll