Re: new.h is missing

2003-07-29 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Betreff: Re: new.h is missing > > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:00:59PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote: > > [...] > > > I was wondering, that in 4.x there is a folder /usr/include/g++ > > > where all the stuff is found, and on 5.1-CURRENT

Re: new.h is missing

2003-07-29 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:00:59PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote: [...] > I was wondering, that in 4.x there is a folder /usr/include/g++ > where all the stuff is found, and on 5.1-CURRENT its in > /usr/include/c++/3.3, where im not sure, whether g++ uses this path > automatically ? > /usr/libexec/cc1

Re: new.h is missing

2003-07-29 Thread Michael Reifenberger
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Kai Mosebach wrote: > Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:54:25 +0200 > From: Kai Mosebach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: new.h is missing > > Hi, > > I am running FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT (22.07.03) > > im trying to port a software, and on compile time i get > > Tool

Re: new.h is missing

2003-07-29 Thread Bradley T Hughes
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 11:54, Kai Mosebach wrote: > Hi, > > I am running FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT (22.07.03) > > im trying to port a software, and on compile time i get > > Tools_List.hpp:51:17: new.h: No such file or directory > > Leading to lots of errors afterwards i.e. : > > void* operator new(unsi