On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 10:28:53AM -0500, David Boyd wrote:
> Having some time to test 9.0-CURRENT with the new dialog command has
> uncovered only one major omission (for us): prgbox/dialog_prgbox.
>
> This is used in most (if not all) of our installation/management scripts.
>
> Was prgbox omitt
On 02/09/11 10:15, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 7:28 AM, David Boyd wrote:
Having some time to test 9.0-CURRENT with the new dialog command has
uncovered only one major omission (for us): prgbox/dialog_prgbox.
This is used in most (if not all) of our installation/management scr
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 7:28 AM, David Boyd wrote:
> Having some time to test 9.0-CURRENT with the new dialog command has
> uncovered only one major omission (for us): prgbox/dialog_prgbox.
>
> This is used in most (if not all) of our installation/management scripts.
>
> Was prgbox omitted for any
