Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread Julian Elischer
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, John Hay wrote: > > > > > Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx. > > > > > > > > IPX is based on XNS. It differs by one significant field. The > > > > SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from > > > > XNS. > > > > > > So you are

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread John Hay
> > > > Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx. > > > > > > IPX is based on XNS. It differs by one significant field. The > > > SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from > > > XNS. > > > > So you are agreeing with me that to use netns to do ipx when we

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread Terry Lambert
John Hay wrote: > > > Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx. > > > > IPX is based on XNS. It differs by one significant field. The > > SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from > > XNS. > > So you are agreeing with me that to use netns to do ipx when w

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread John Hay
> John Hay wrote: > > Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx. > > IPX is based on XNS. It differs by one significant field. The > SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from > XNS. So you are agreeing with me that to use netns to do ipx when we have neti

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread Terry Lambert
John Hay wrote: > Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx. IPX is based on XNS. It differs by one significant field. The SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from XNS. FWIW. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe fre

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread John Hay
Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx. > > I believe there are people whi use it in -stabel for netware > connectivity. > I think that not having it would be a killer for them when they try move > up to 5.x. > > On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Erik Greenwald wrote: > > > > > Does an

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread Julian Elischer
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju > lian Elischer writes: > > > >I believe there are people whi use it in -stabel for netware > >connectivity. > >I think that not having it would be a killer for them when they try move > >up to 5.x. > > Well, th

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju lian Elischer writes: > >I believe there are people whi use it in -stabel for netware >connectivity. >I think that not having it would be a killer for them when they try move >up to 5.x. Well, they'd better get somebody to fix it then because if it doesn't at le

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread Julian Elischer
I believe there are people whi use it in -stabel for netware connectivity. I think that not having it would be a killer for them when they try move up to 5.x. On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Erik Greenwald wrote: > > Does anyone use src/sys/netns (xerox networking)? it's currently > uncompilable, seems t

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Keith Sklower did that work. PORTS? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <20020922163034.GA29873@freya>, Erik Greenwald writes: > >Does anyone use src/sys/netns (xerox networking)? it's currently >uncompilable, seems to have been so for a while, and sys/conf/NOTES says >it's provided for "amusement" value, and are only shipped due to >interest. I wouldn't mi