* Kostik Belousov (kostik...@gmail.com) wrote:
I've tried the second patch, it works fine. It would be very nice to see
it in 8.1, thanks.
--
Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 1:05:26 pm Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:41:09AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 May 2010 11:06:22 am Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 06:30:35PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > Not long ago, P
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:41:09AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday 30 May 2010 11:06:22 am Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 06:30:35PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Not long ago, POSIX semaphores support was enabled by default as it's
> > > becoming
On Sunday 30 May 2010 11:06:22 am Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 06:30:35PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Not long ago, POSIX semaphores support was enabled by default as it's
> > becoming more widely used, by e.g. firefox. However, the support
> > for these is s
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 06:30:35PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Not long ago, POSIX semaphores support was enabled by default as it's
> becoming more widely used, by e.g. firefox. However, the support
> for these is still incomplete: we only have systemwide limit of 30
> semaphores, an
