On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 15:21 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gerhard Sittig writes:
>
> >I miss the continuation mark (backslashes at line ends). [...]
>
> I don't change the md5-grammar, only the output when it verifies
> a filesystem against a file (containin
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gerhard Sittig writes:
>I miss the continuation mark (backslashes at line ends). In case
>someone wrote parsers / formatters they should still be there.
>This way you don't change grammar but merely layout for better
>readability by humans.
I don't change the md5
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 23:53 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> I would like to change the outputformat of mtree(8) to be more
> systematic and machine-readable.
>
> [ ... ]
>
> Before:
>
> rc: size (13134, 13135)
> cksum (2005920215, 873112433)
> > > >This is still very obscure; I'd like to see:
> > > >
> > > > size (was 1234, should be 5678)
> > > > cksum (was 42424242, should be 69696969)
> > > >
> > > >...so that it's clear what the meaning of the numbers is.
> > >
> > > In that case I think I would like to loose the
> > >This is still very obscure; I'd like to see:
> > >
> > > size (was 1234, should be 5678)
> > > cksum (was 42424242, should be 69696969)
> > >
> > >...so that it's clear what the meaning of the numbers is.
> >
> > In that case I think I would like to loose the ',' also.
>
On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 10:46:56AM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
> > > size (was 1234, should be 5678)
> > > cksum (was 42424242, should be 69696969)
> > >
> > >...so that it's clear what the meaning of the numbers is.
> >
> > In that case I think I would like to loose the ',' als
> >This is still very obscure; I'd like to see:
> >
> > size (was 1234, should be 5678)
> > cksum (was 42424242, should be 69696969)
> >
> >...so that it's clear what the meaning of the numbers is.
>
> In that case I think I would like to loose the ',' also.
While you're
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Garrett Wollman write
s:
>< said:
>
>> make "extra" and "missing" attributes in the output
>> rather than prefixes which can be confused with filenames.
>
>> Don't do the "run-in" of the first attribute with a short
>> filename
>
>This looks like
