Re: malloc.h

2001-11-10 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > As I understand it, the only problem is if some implementation indicates > non-conformance with #define __STDC__ 0, which is unheard of to me, and, > if I were an implementor of such a system, I'd just leave it undefined. That is a slight misinterpretation of what those systems do. T

Re: malloc.h

2001-11-10 Thread Jens Schweikhardt
Hello Jörg et al, # Just for grins, i dug out my old CP/M C compiler. (SuperSoft C, 1983 # vintage) That one's the only one so far i've seen where # # #if __STDC__ # # wouldn't work as expected -- but # # #if (__STDC__ - 1) == 0 # # wouldn't either. Apparently, this compiler substituted a

Re: malloc.h

2001-11-09 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Garrett Wollman wrote: > < said: > > > Well, no. Solaris uses #if (__STDC__-1==0) only in connection with > > other conditions in the same #if part. Otherwise, they use a simple > > #ifdef __STDC__ as well. FreeBSD uses a simple `#ifdef __STDC__' (everywhere else in /usr/in