Re: make release failure in kerberos

2002-02-21 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 06:24:59AM +0200, John Hay wrote: > Hi Jacques, > > Make release fails here. Can it be your changes to kerberos? Could be; I'll have a look. Thanks! -- Jacques A. Vidrine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.nectar.cc/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNI

Re: make release failure

2001-05-30 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, John Hay wrote: > I have now also tested your second patch and with a minor mod to make > make happy, the release finished. Here is the patch as I have used it. [snip] Great, thanks for testing this! I'm still having problems keeping my scratch box alive long enough

Re: make release failure

2001-05-30 Thread John Hay
Bruce, > > Yes, this patch fix it for me. I had to convert the spaces back to tabs > > though. :-) > > Hi John-- > > I was trying to test out another patch, which (in addition to fixing > the problem you found) also folds the functionality of NORELNOTES into > NODOC. Unfortunately, my -CURRE

Re: make release failure

2001-05-29 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, John Hay wrote: > Yes, this patch fix it for me. I had to convert the spaces back to tabs > though. :-) Hi John-- I was trying to test out another patch, which (in addition to fixing the problem you found) also folds the functionality of NORELNOTES into NODOC. Unfor

Re: make release failure

2001-05-28 Thread John Hay
Yes, this patch fix it for me. I had to convert the spaces back to tabs though. :-) John -- John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > If memory serves me right, Dima Dorfman wrote: > > John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > *** Filesystem is 1440 K, 66 left > > > > > *** 4000 bytes/inode,

Re: make release failure

2001-05-28 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Dima Dorfman wrote: > "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 11:32:09PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > > +.if !defined(NORELNOTES) > > > > Do we really need Yet Another Knob? Why isn't NODOC suffient? > > FWIW, I think we should lose N

Re: make release failure

2001-05-27 Thread Dima Dorfman
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 11:32:09PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > +.if !defined(NORELNOTES) > > Do we really need Yet Another Knob? Why isn't NODOC suffient? FWIW, I think we should lose NORELNOTES; as you say, NODOC is sufficient. > I cannot think

Re: make release failure

2001-05-27 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 11:32:09PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > +.if !defined(NORELNOTES) Do we really need Yet Another Knob? Why isn't NODOC suffient? I cannot think of any reason that the people who typically use NODOC=yes would want release notes. Or please at least treat NODOCS=yes ==> NOR

Re: make release failure

2001-05-27 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Dima Dorfman wrote: > John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > *** Filesystem is 1440 K, 66 left > > > > *** 4000 bytes/inode, 116 left > > > > cp: /usr/src/release/texts/FLOPPIES.TXT: No such file or directory > > > > > > What revision of src/release/Makefile

Re: make release failure

2001-05-27 Thread Dima Dorfman
John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > A make release failed here with: > > > > > > # > > > touch release.8 > > > Making fixit floppy. > > > disklabel: ioctl DIOCWLABEL: Operation not supported by device > > > Warning: Block size restricts cylinders per group t

Re: make release failure

2001-05-27 Thread John Hay
> > A make release failed here with: > > > > # > > touch release.8 > > Making fixit floppy. > > disklabel: ioctl DIOCWLABEL: Operation not supported by device > > Warning: Block size restricts cylinders per group to 6. > > Warning: 1216 sector(s) in last cylinder u

Re: make release failure

2001-05-27 Thread Dima Dorfman
John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A make release failed here with: > > # > touch release.8 > Making fixit floppy. > disklabel: ioctl DIOCWLABEL: Operation not supported by device > Warning: Block size restricts cylinders per group to 6. > Warning: 1216 sector(

Re: make release failure

2001-05-27 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 10:45:59PM +0200, John Hay wrote: This strongly smells like a side-effect of RELNOTESng that removed the 'texts' subdir in favor of generated .txt from .sgml source files Wilko > A make release failed here with: > > # > touch release.8 >

Re: make release failure - ipfilter(osreldate.h)

2000-10-28 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 01:54:52PM -0700, John W. De Boskey wrote: > /usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/../../netinet/mlfk_ipl.c:44: > @/netinet/ip_compat.h:268: osreldate.h: No such file or directory > *** Error code 1 This was fixed (two different ways) 2 days ago. What rev of /sys/modules/Makefile

Re: make release failure during ports

2000-05-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 07:15:56PM -0400, John W. DeBoskey wrote: > fyi... > > ===> Creating README.html for tkrat-1.2 > ===> mail/tkrat2 This belongs in [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of

Re: make release failure during ports

2000-05-07 Thread Otter
"John W. DeBoskey" wrote: > > fyi... > > ===> Creating README.html for tkrat-1.2 > ===> mail/tkrat2 > ===> Creating README.html for tkrat-2.0b9 > ===> mail/wanderlust-emacs > Error: Bad value of EMACS_PORT_NAME: emacs. > Valid values are: > Emacs family: emacs19 mule19 emacs20 >

Re: make release failure

2000-01-29 Thread German Tischler
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 10:11:05AM +0100, Yoshinobu Inoue wrote: > Sorry for the problem. Could you try with this patch for now? Thank you, it worked, at least for completing the interupted release build. I have not tested in which way the patch affects building the world though. -- German Tisc

Re: make release failure

2000-01-29 Thread Yoshinobu Inoue
> It might be easier to just commit it if `make buildworld' passes. OK, but now I have middle class speed machine at hand, and maybe it takes 2 or 3 hours. Also, do other apps which use libipsec will need same kind of change? (There is one under usr.bin, and several under usr.sbin.) Yoshinobu I

Re: make release failure

2000-01-29 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 07:14:48PM +0900, Yoshinobu Inoue wrote: > > Sorry for the problem. Could you try with this patch for now? It might be easier to just commit it if `make buildworld' passes. With the double CVS checkout required in `make release' I don't know an easy good way to apply patch

Re: make release failure

2000-01-29 Thread Yoshinobu Inoue
> Sorry for the problem. Could you try with this patch for now? Last patch was bad. Please try this one instead. Yoshinobu Inoue --- usr.bin/telnet/Makefile.orig Thu Jan 27 15:04:00 2000 +++ usr.bin/telnet/MakefileSun Jan 30 04:28:44 2000 @@ -40,12 +40,12 @@ CFLAGS+=-DENV_HACK CFLAG

Re: make release failure

2000-01-29 Thread Yoshinobu Inoue
> Hi. > > I just tried a ,make release' with USA_RESIDENT set to NO. It failed with > dit -lgnuregex -lkvm -lz > telnet.lo: In function `setpolicy': > telnet.lo(.text+0x22af): undefined reference to `ipsec_set_policy' > telnet.lo(.text+0x22c0): undefined reference to `ipsec_strerror' > telnet.lo

Re: make release failure

2000-01-26 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake Rajappa Iyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > That's certainly possible, although it might be a good idea to use a > variable to point to a make.conf file. This way "make release" does > not have to be too aware of what "make world" requires in > /etc/make.conf. though a make release in any ca

Re: make release failure

2000-01-25 Thread Rajappa Iyer
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 03:54:13PM -0500, Rajappa Iyer wrote: > > Yes, but $CHROOTDIR/etc is populated by "make installworld" when I do > > Why not just set USA_RESIDENT in your environment before starting > `make release'? That's certainly possible

Re: make release failure

2000-01-25 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 03:54:13PM -0500, Rajappa Iyer wrote: > Yes, but $CHROOTDIR/etc is populated by "make installworld" when I do Why not just set USA_RESIDENT in your environment before starting `make release'? -- -- David([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: make release failure

2000-01-25 Thread Rajappa Iyer
Bruce Burden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > make release fails on "make world" with: > > > > !! > > >>> You must define the value of USA_RESIDENT as 'YES' or > > >>> 'NO' as appropriate, in the environment or /etc/make.conf > > >>

Re: make release failure

2000-01-25 Thread Bruce Burden
> > make release fails on "make world" with: > > !! > >>> You must define the value of USA_RESIDENT as 'YES' or > >>> 'NO' as appropriate, in the environment or /etc/make.conf > >>> before building can proceed. > !!!

Re: make release failure (mkdep & kget.c)

1999-05-06 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
>I don't know if anyone else has seen this yet. I'm current as of > 5 1/2 hours ago... (2am EST, 11pm PST). I had a non-standard Makefile, my bad. Fixed an hour or so ago. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the mes