Thus spake Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > I retained the int 12h fallback just to be safe, but I
> > > > think the bootinfo structure is initialized with a valid basemem
> > > > for all loaders since at least 1998. (Maybe the fallbacks in the
>
> Since 1995, but not in boot2 since 2002/
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, David Schultz wrote:
> Thus spake Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > This approach is okay with me in the sense that it doesn't break
> > > anything that wasn't already broken, but as you say, I think we
> > > can do better. Below is a patch that merely extracts the b
Thus spake Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > This approach is okay with me in the sense that it doesn't break
> > anything that wasn't already broken, but as you say, I think we
> > can do better. Below is a patch that merely extracts the basemem
> > size from the bootinfo structure for the
Hi,
> Thus spake Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > OK, it seems to be difficult to determine the region for any BIOSes.
> > I've decided to introduce a new loader tunable to indicate that BIOS
> > has broken int 12H. Attached patch back out 1.385.2.26 changes to
> > support older BIOSes, a
Thus spake Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> OK, it seems to be difficult to determine the region for any BIOSes.
> I've decided to introduce a new loader tunable to indicate that BIOS
> has broken int 12H. Attached patch back out 1.385.2.26 changes to
> support older BIOSes, and add support
