Re: libss termination

2001-08-21 Thread Wes Peters
Terry Lambert wrote: > > Peter Wemm wrote: > > > > > > > > As far as I can tell, there's nothing in the tree which uses > > > > > > libss any longer, and hasnt been for quite some time. Is > > > > > > there any reason to keep it? > > > > > > > > > > Nope. > > > > > > > > Right. Kill it. > > > >

Re: libss termination

2001-08-21 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 06:12:58AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Peter Wemm wrote: > > > > > > As far as I can tell, there's nothing in the tree which uses > > > > > > libss any longer, and hasnt been for quite some time. Is > > > > > > there any reason to keep it? > > > > > > > > > > Nope. > > >

Re: libss termination

2001-08-21 Thread Terry Lambert
Peter Wemm wrote: > > > > > As far as I can tell, there's nothing in the tree which uses > > > > > libss any longer, and hasnt been for quite some time. Is > > > > > there any reason to keep it? > > > > > > > > Nope. > > > > > > Right. Kill it. > > > > Are there any ports which depnd on it, and t

Re: libss termination

2001-08-21 Thread Peter Wemm
Terry Lambert wrote: > Mark Murray wrote: > > > > > > > > > > As far as I can tell, there's nothing in the tree which uses libss any > > > > longer, and hasnt been for quite some time. Is there any reason to > > > > keep it? > > > > > > Nope. > > > > Right. Kill it. > > Are there any ports whi

Re: libss termination

2001-08-21 Thread Terry Lambert
Mark Murray wrote: > > > > > > > As far as I can tell, there's nothing in the tree which uses libss any > > > longer, and hasnt been for quite some time. Is there any reason to > > > keep it? > > > > Nope. > > Right. Kill it. Are there any ports which depnd on it, and thus assume it's in the b

Re: libss termination

2001-08-20 Thread NAKAJI Hiroyuki
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: nakaji> Usr.bin/mk_cmds is still using libss. And buildworld fails. Kris> Thanks; I fixed this already (by removing mk_cmds too :-) Oops... I should have checked http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.bin/mk_c

Re: libss termination

2001-08-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 04:28:07PM +0900, NAKAJI Hiroyuki wrote: > > Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MM> > > > MM> > > As far as I can tell, there's nothing in the tree which uses libss any > MM> > > longer, and hasnt been for quite some time. Is there any reason to > MM> > > keep i

Re: libss termination

2001-08-20 Thread NAKAJI Hiroyuki
> Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: MM> > > MM> > > As far as I can tell, there's nothing in the tree which uses libss any MM> > > longer, and hasnt been for quite some time. Is there any reason to MM> > > keep it? MM> > MM> > Nope. MM> Right. Kill it. Usr.bin/mk_cmds is still usin

Re: libss termination

2001-08-19 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:54:02AM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > > Is this caused by libss termination? > > At Sun, 19 Aug 2001 07:48:07 + (UTC), > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > As far as I can tell, there's nothing in the tree which uses libss any > > longer, and hasnt been for quite some time.

Re: libss termination

2001-08-19 Thread Mike Smith
Yes; mk_cmds is part of libss and should have been deleted as well. > Is this caused by libss termination? > > At Sun, 19 Aug 2001 07:48:07 + (UTC), > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > As far as I can tell, there's nothing in the tree which uses libss any > > longer, and hasnt been for quite some ti

Re: libss termination

2001-08-19 Thread Jun Kuriyama
Is this caused by libss termination? At Sun, 19 Aug 2001 07:48:07 + (UTC), Kris Kennaway wrote: > As far as I can tell, there's nothing in the tree which uses libss any > longer, and hasnt been for quite some time. Is there any reason to > keep it? ===> usr.bin/mk_cmds yacc -d /usr/src/us

Re: libss termination

2001-08-19 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 12:51:24PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: > > > > > > As far as I can tell, there's nothing in the tree which uses libss any > > > longer, and hasnt been for quite some time. Is there any reason to > > > keep it? > > > > Nope. > > Right. Kill it. Dead! Kris PGP signature

Re: libss termination

2001-08-19 Thread Mark Murray
> > > > As far as I can tell, there's nothing in the tree which uses libss any > > longer, and hasnt been for quite some time. Is there any reason to > > keep it? > > Nope. Right. Kill it. M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: libss termination

2001-08-19 Thread Mike Smith
> > As far as I can tell, there's nothing in the tree which uses libss any > longer, and hasnt been for quite some time. Is there any reason to > keep it? Nope. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because peo