> ># $ brucify Makefile
> ># Line 123: Continuation of rule should be indented 4 spaces, not 1 tab
> ># character.
> >
> >I pilfered the format from src/lib/libalias/Makefile, so it fails
> >brucify(1) there as well. :)
>
> I don't know where all the bad examples in src/lib/*/Makefile ca
># $ brucify Makefile
># Line 123: Continuation of rule should be indented 4 spaces, not 1 tab
># character.
>
>I pilfered the format from src/lib/libalias/Makefile, so it fails
>brucify(1) there as well. :)
I don't know where all the bad examples in src/lib/*/Makefile came from.
In Lite
On Sun, 23 May 1999, David O'Brien wrote:
# > Index: Makefile
# > ===
# > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/gnu/lib/libg2c/Makefile,v
#
# > +beforeinstall:
# > + ${INSTALL} -C -o ${BINOWN} -g ${BINGRP} -m 444 ${.CURDIR}/g2c.h \
# > +
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/gnu/lib/libg2c/Makefile,v
> +beforeinstall:
> + ${INSTALL} -C -o ${BINOWN} -g ${BINGRP} -m 444 ${.CURDIR}/g2c.h \
> + ${DESTDIR}/usr/include
> +
$ brucify Makefi
> Anyone know why libf2c* was renamed to libg2c* in egcs?
Cygnus has hacked (possibly considerably) Bell-Labs' libf2c. To the
point a program written to the EGCS's FORTRAN lib wouldn't be linkable
with libf2c. Thus they felt the need for a unique name.
> Does egcs have a replacement for f2c?
