As Chuck Robey wrote ...
> I was thinking about Peter Wemm's recent change to the kernel Makefile,
> making a way to install multiple kernels without fragging your last
> known good kernel, and it got me to thinking, scragging kernel.old, now
> that we have good kld's, isn't the only way to find yo
I wish :-(
It seems that some people think that it is OK to make changes to stable
even though those changes break things which used to work.
IMHO, branches of the kernel SHOULD be like shared libraries.
(It is OK to ADD previously absent features or CORRECT internal errors,
but NOT OK to delete
> >Something on the order of modules.old is going to need to
> >be implemented.
>
> Not to mention /boot/kernel.old.config ...
>
> I think you are seeing -current as the norm. You shouldn't. Under
> -stable the modules should (tm) continue to work since there are not
> made API changes in -stab
In message , Chuck Robe
y writes:
>Something on the order of modules.old is going to need to
>be implemented.
Not to mention /boot/kernel.old.config ...
I think you are seeing -current as the norm. You shouldn't. Under
-stable the modules should (tm) continue to work since there are not
made A
