On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 04:10:26 -0800 David Wolfskill wrote
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 10:08:45PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply.
> > I rebooted to kernel.old, so I could get the exact
> > src revision I built this on. It's r314640
> >
> > Any news as to whether it's safe to update sr
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 10:08:45PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
> I rebooted to kernel.old, so I could get the exact
> src revision I built this on. It's r314640
>
> Any news as to whether it's safe to update src, and
> build a usable kernel?
>
I (try to -- and usually succe
On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:50:49 AM Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 05/03/2017 08:08, Chris H wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply.
> > I rebooted to kernel.old, so I could get the exact
> > src revision I built this on. It's r314640
> >
> > Any news as to whether it's safe to update src, and
> > build a usable ke
On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:50:49 +0200 Andriy Gapon wrote
> On 05/03/2017 08:08, Chris H wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply.
> > I rebooted to kernel.old, so I could get the exact
> > src revision I built this on. It's r314640
> >
> > Any news as to whether it's safe to update src, and
> > build a usabl
On 05/03/2017 08:08, Chris H wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
> I rebooted to kernel.old, so I could get the exact
> src revision I built this on. It's r314640
>
> Any news as to whether it's safe to update src, and
> build a usable kernel?
Sorry about the breakage.
The fix is in r314700.
>
> On
On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 10:34:39 PM Chris H wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Mar 2017 14:26:31 +0800 Alastair Hogge wrote
>
> > On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 10:08:45 PM Chris H wrote:
> > > Thanks for the reply.
> > > I rebooted to kernel.old, so I could get the exact
> > > src revision I built this on. It's r314640
> > >
On Sun, 05 Mar 2017 14:26:31 +0800 Alastair Hogge wrote
> On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 10:08:45 PM Chris H wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply.
> > I rebooted to kernel.old, so I could get the exact
> > src revision I built this on. It's r314640
> >
> > Any news as to whether it's safe to update src, and
> >
On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 10:08:45 PM Chris H wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
> I rebooted to kernel.old, so I could get the exact
> src revision I built this on. It's r314640
>
> Any news as to whether it's safe to update src, and
> build a usable kernel?
I am not able to boot a kernel > r314627. I cur
Thanks for the reply.
I rebooted to kernel.old, so I could get the exact
src revision I built this on. It's r314640
Any news as to whether it's safe to update src, and
build a usable kernel?
Thanks.
--Chris
On Sun, 05 Mar 2017 12:01:29 +0800 Alastair Hogge wrote
> Hi *,
>
> On Sat, 4 Mar 201
Hi *,
On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 07:38:55 PM Chris H wrote:
[remove 12-CURRENT history & hardware summary]
> I finished the
> buildworld, and finished the build/install kernel, and
> (attempted) to boot to single user. But got a trap
> shortly into booting the new kernel;
>
> kernel trap 12 with interr
On 9 Nov, I wrote:
> I just got one of these shortly after I rebooted my November 7th
> -CURRENT box. DDB doesn't show much interesting.
>
> kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
>
>
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
> fault virtual address = 0xbc04
I forgot to add that I'm not seeing any of this with the PIII's that I have
running current and usually updated daily.
This may not help much unless there is some common ground to be found.
I have been having problems with my old K6-2 300Mhz laptop hanging in X with
linux-communicator. From ther
This may not help much unless there is some common ground to be found.
I have been having problems with my old K6-2 300Mhz laptop hanging in X with
linux-communicator. From there I have not been able to get any debugging info.
Last night I did a power off/on reset and went to bed. This morning I
On Sat, 19 May 2001 22:48:51 -0400, Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> You'll have to provide more info before anyone can help you.
Well, that would require the kernel offering me more information.
> Can you at least get a DDB traceback?
I have never succeeded in getting that
* Michael Harnois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010519 22:44] wrote:
> is the message I get as soon as I'm done booting with a kernel build
> from this evening's cvsup. No other messages ... sorry, no serial
> console ...
You'll have to provide more info before anyone can help you.
Can you at least get a
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On 9 Feb, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> > Pagefaults occur in copyin() (called from addupc_task() which is called
> > from ast()) while sched_lock is held. This is not good. Incrementing
> > the profiling counters is supposed to be pushed to ordinary
On 9 Feb, Bruce Evans wrote:
> Pagefaults occur in copyin() (called from addupc_task() which is called
> from ast()) while sched_lock is held. This is not good. Incrementing
> the profiling counters is supposed to be pushed to ordinary process
> context so that things like copyin() can work (t
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> if I run a program compiled with gcc's function profiling option I get
> "kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled".
This happens with the standard profiling option -pg.
Pagefaults occur in copyin() (called from addupc_task() which is called
from
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if I run a program compiled with gcc's function profiling option I get
> "kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled".
The same is here.
-Maxim
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On 23-Oct-00 The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> kernel of today, during a make world, generates:
>
> Oct 23 18:32:18 thelab /boot/kernel/kernel: kernel trap 12 with interrupts
> disabled
> Oct 23 18:32:32 thelab /boot/kernel/kernel: kernel trap 12 with interrupts
> disabled
> Oct 23 18:32:39 thel
I got the same with addition that the machine hangs:(
Val
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Manfred Antar wrote:
> With current kernel I'm getting alot of :
> kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
> kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
> kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
> kernel trap 12 with int
21 matches
Mail list logo
